2011
DOI: 10.1021/cb100420r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rational Methods for the Selection of Diverse Screening Compounds

Abstract: Traditionally a pursuit of large pharmaceutical companies, high-throughput screening assays are becoming increasingly common within academic and government laboratories. This shift has been instrumental in enabling projects that have not been commercially viable, such as chemical probe discovery and screening against high risk targets. Once an assay has been prepared and validated, it must be fed with screening compounds. Crafting a successful collection of small molecules for screening poses a significant cha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
83
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
(177 reference statements)
0
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, these minor structural changes afford higher similarity scores (average of 0.67, see Supplementary Figure 2), consistent with work of others using Tanimoto coefficients. 48 For the similarity matrix of the full 49 compound set, please see Supplementary Figure 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected, these minor structural changes afford higher similarity scores (average of 0.67, see Supplementary Figure 2), consistent with work of others using Tanimoto coefficients. 48 For the similarity matrix of the full 49 compound set, please see Supplementary Figure 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are basically two distinct, arguably equally valid approaches to diversity selection 50. 51 The first are so‐called pro‐rata methods, aimed at reproducing a core of the initial library by sampling, out of each CS zone, a number of compounds proportional to the local compound density. Alternatively, one may adopt homogeneity‐oriented approaches aimed at producing equal samples of every populated CS zone.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further prioritize the remaining hits, we classified and clustered their chemical structures, applied computational filters (PAINS/REOS) to identify and eliminate nuisance compounds and to predict their drug-like characteristics and potentially adverse ADME/Tox properties, 37,38 and considered their chemical tractability. A total of 23 small-molecule candidates were selected for further analysis.…”
Section: Validation Of Selected Hit Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%