2015
DOI: 10.1039/c5nr04870b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rational design of nanomaterials for water treatment

Abstract: The ever-increasing human demand for safe and clean water is gradually pushing conventional water treatment technologies to their limits. It is now a popular perception that the solutions to the existing and future water challenges will hinge upon further developments in nanomaterial sciences. The concept of rational design emphasizes on 'design-for-purpose' and it necessitates a scientifically clear problem definition to initiate the nanomaterial design. The field of rational design of nanomaterials for water… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
132
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 395 publications
(864 reference statements)
1
132
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…ETAS is expected to show higher energy efficiencies and incur lower environmental costs than established methods for separation of neutral organics from water such as distillation, stripping, extraction, adsorption and filtration. [11][12][13] It operates at ambient temperature and pressure, requires no need for 21 -responsive systems that exhibit only two levels of hydrophobicity (i.e., merely ''on/off'' bimodal control), ETAS can achieve multiple levels of hydrophobicity and thus affinity towards organics since the electrical signal (i.e., potential) can be tuned with high precision, permitting a systematic adjustment of the ratio between the hydrophobic and hydrophilic moieties. Such flexible modulation of affinity for target pollutants is key to achieving a balance between the separation degree and the energetic efficiency, as discussed later.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ETAS is expected to show higher energy efficiencies and incur lower environmental costs than established methods for separation of neutral organics from water such as distillation, stripping, extraction, adsorption and filtration. [11][12][13] It operates at ambient temperature and pressure, requires no need for 21 -responsive systems that exhibit only two levels of hydrophobicity (i.e., merely ''on/off'' bimodal control), ETAS can achieve multiple levels of hydrophobicity and thus affinity towards organics since the electrical signal (i.e., potential) can be tuned with high precision, permitting a systematic adjustment of the ratio between the hydrophobic and hydrophilic moieties. Such flexible modulation of affinity for target pollutants is key to achieving a balance between the separation degree and the energetic efficiency, as discussed later.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10] High separation efficiencies for the removal of organics from water have been achieved using conventional processes such as adsorption, stripping, distillation, and solvent extraction, as well as more recent technologies such as advanced oxidation treatment and membrane separation. [11][12][13] However, the overall separation processes inherently associated with these methods usually involve energy-intensive steps (e.g. requirement for high temperature or pressure) and/or environmentally unfriendly processes (e.g., use of organic solvents and additives, generation of secondary pollutants).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, increasing water demands have forced research into membranes with a superior water flux. With this progress in water flux enhancement, research into membrane antifouling has become more and more pressing as membrane fouling worsens along with increasing water flux [9,10]. Fouled membranes have substantially shorter lifespan and lessened filtration efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 However, traditional nanoporous adsorbents, such as activated carbon, are incompatible with micrometer-sized droplets. [4][5][6] polyurethane sponge coated with decyl capped nanocrystalline silicon. The surface chemistry, surface charge, roughness, and surface energy were characterized using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, microscopy, electrokinetic analysis, and inverse chromatographic techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%