1985
DOI: 10.5465/amr.1985.4278118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rational Behavior in Groups: The Free-Riding Tendency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
79
0
8

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 289 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
79
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Team member contributions, often referred to as workload sharing, have been linked to a number of team outcomes including performance, satisfaction, and social cohesion (Campion et al, 1993; Campion, Papper, & Medsker, 1996; Barrick, Stewart, Neubert, & Mount, 1998; Erez, Lepine, & Elms, 2002). Balancing team members’ work contributions may help prevent many of the problems associated with free‐riding or social loafing (Latané, Williams, & Harkins, 1979; Albanese & Van Fleet, 1985). For projects that involve relatively simple activities, free‐riders effectively reduce the amount of time and human resources (i.e., manpower) available to the team.…”
Section: Linking Collaborative Behaviors To Team Performance In 3d Cvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Team member contributions, often referred to as workload sharing, have been linked to a number of team outcomes including performance, satisfaction, and social cohesion (Campion et al, 1993; Campion, Papper, & Medsker, 1996; Barrick, Stewart, Neubert, & Mount, 1998; Erez, Lepine, & Elms, 2002). Balancing team members’ work contributions may help prevent many of the problems associated with free‐riding or social loafing (Latané, Williams, & Harkins, 1979; Albanese & Van Fleet, 1985). For projects that involve relatively simple activities, free‐riders effectively reduce the amount of time and human resources (i.e., manpower) available to the team.…”
Section: Linking Collaborative Behaviors To Team Performance In 3d Cvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter then feel tremendous scrutiny and anxiety and become less willing to look for efficiency advantages through alignment because such efficiencies also benefit the former actors (Ames, ). Finally, a joint reward system may encourage free‐riding across organizational units (Albanese and Van Fleet, ), whereby particular units exploit the similarity (i.e., alignment) in activities to contribute less to cross‐functional responsibilities while also assuming that they will receive rewards similar to those granted to their colleagues in other, harder working units (Lee and Ahn, ). Ultimately, such free‐riding can create a downward motivational spiral across the organization (Wagner, ), such that the performance outcomes derived from alignment are subdued.…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the formal information systems that firms implement to increase information quality, such as internal controls, may not produce the unique, “soft” information required for innovation and may exacerbate the “quiet life” agency problem whereby formal controls decrease managers’ need to make discretionary decisions (Li, Shu, Tang, & Zheng, 2019; Stein, 2002). Third, a more widespread sharing of information can negatively affect innovation by increasing the likelihood of premature consensus and groupthink or by making it easier for employees to freeride on the ideas of others (Albanese & Van Fleet, 1985; Esser, 1998; Janis, 1971; Li & Sandino, 2018).…”
Section: Related Literature and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%