2019
DOI: 10.1142/s0219024919500109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rational Approximation of the Rough Heston Solution

Abstract: Pricing in the rough Heston model of Jaisson & M. Rosenbaum [(2016) Rough fractional diffusions as scaling limits of nearly unstable heavy tailed Hawkes processes, The Annals of Applied Probability 26 (5), 2860–2882] requires the solution of a fractional Riccati differential equation, which is not known in explicit form. Though numerical schemes to approximate this solution do exist, they inevitably require significantly more time to compute than the closed-form solution in the classical Heston model. In t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This disadvantage is the main cause of us shifting our attention from relying on numerical methods such as the fractional Adams-Bashforth-Moulton method for the computation of the fractional Riccati equation's solution. It is noted that in [19] a large number of steps are required to obtain a stable solution for only the characteristic function of the rough Heston model, not forgetting that the inversion of a characteristic function to the call option price requires additional computational costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This disadvantage is the main cause of us shifting our attention from relying on numerical methods such as the fractional Adams-Bashforth-Moulton method for the computation of the fractional Riccati equation's solution. It is noted that in [19] a large number of steps are required to obtain a stable solution for only the characteristic function of the rough Heston model, not forgetting that the inversion of a characteristic function to the call option price requires additional computational costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is noted that the fractional Adams method generally provides extremely consistent results with a large number of time steps, the time complexity of the method is at O(N 2 ), where N is the number of time steps of the fractional Adams method. Nevertheless, it has became a standard method to compare consistency on the computation of call option prices for different methods, such as in [19,24]. By the way, the time complexity O(N 2 ) is not the final computational cost of the option pricing formula, as the time complexity is only for the characteristic function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations