2004
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1084-0680(2004)9:3(125)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rational and Irrational Design Loads for “Temporary” Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hill [161] raised the issue as to whether the design loads for temporary structures should be lower than those for permanent structures as is often postulated by some designers as the structures are only in existence for a limited time. However, he argued that this can lead to failures.…”
Section: Dead and Imposed Vertical Loadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hill [161] raised the issue as to whether the design loads for temporary structures should be lower than those for permanent structures as is often postulated by some designers as the structures are only in existence for a limited time. However, he argued that this can lead to failures.…”
Section: Dead and Imposed Vertical Loadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design wind velocity in the example cited (for a factor of safety of 2 and a 2-year exposure time) is obtained to be a reduced value of 53 mph with a 0.5 percent probability of failure within the exposure time. Hill (2004) provides a comprehensive discussion on loads for temporary structures and offers a critique on the method presented by Boggs and Peterka. Hill suggests that in certain cases the use of reduced load (derived on the basis of a shorter life expected for a temporary structure) may be justified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%