2015
DOI: 10.21307/stattrans-2015-010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ratio-to-Regression Estimator in Successive Sampling Using One Auxiliary Variable

Abstract: The problem of estimation of finite population mean on the current occasion based on the samples selected over two occasions has been considered. In this paper, first a chain ratio-to-regression estimator was proposed to estimate the population mean on the current occasion in two-occasion successive (rotation) sampling using only the matched part and one auxiliary variable, which is available in both the occasions. The bias and mean square error of the proposed estimator is obtained. We proposed another estima… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Utilizing the auxiliary information on both the occasions Feng and Zou (1997), Biradar and Singh (2001), Singh (2005) and Singh and Karna (2009 a, b) proposed ratio and regression type estimators for estimating the population mean on the current (second) occasion in two-occasion successive sampling. More recently, the contributions of Ralte and Das (2015), Singh and Pal (2015), Karna and Nath (2016) and Beevi and Chandran (2017) established beneficial results by using the auxiliary variables on both the occasions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utilizing the auxiliary information on both the occasions Feng and Zou (1997), Biradar and Singh (2001), Singh (2005) and Singh and Karna (2009 a, b) proposed ratio and regression type estimators for estimating the population mean on the current (second) occasion in two-occasion successive sampling. More recently, the contributions of Ralte and Das (2015), Singh and Pal (2015), Karna and Nath (2016) and Beevi and Chandran (2017) established beneficial results by using the auxiliary variables on both the occasions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%