1991
DOI: 10.1016/0149-1970(91)90037-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ratio tests of dosimetry cross-sections for 93Nb(n,2n)92mNb and 197Au(n,2n)196Au to 27Al(n,α)24Na reactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1993
1993
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This decision may not correctly reflect the covariance in cases where new experimental data have resulted in significant changes in the evaluation. Second, the IRDF-90 library evaluations were often based on the application of a statistical methodology with careful selection/renormalization of experimental data [17,18], while the JENDL-3 Dosimetry Library was often based on fitting of theoretical model calculations to the experimental data [19].…”
Section: Comparison Of Cross Section Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This decision may not correctly reflect the covariance in cases where new experimental data have resulted in significant changes in the evaluation. Second, the IRDF-90 library evaluations were often based on the application of a statistical methodology with careful selection/renormalization of experimental data [17,18], while the JENDL-3 Dosimetry Library was often based on fitting of theoretical model calculations to the experimental data [19].…”
Section: Comparison Of Cross Section Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This decision may not correctly reflect the covariance in cases where new experimental data have resulted in significant changes in the evaluation. Second, whereas some evaluations, such as the IRDF-90 library,were often based on the application of a statistical methodology with careful selection/renormalization of experimental data [23,24], theJENDL-3 Dosimetry librarywas often based on fittingof theoretical model calculations to the experimental data [25].…”
Section: Endl-3 Dosimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%