2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ratio of Intratumoral Macrophage Phenotypes Is a Prognostic Factor in Epithelioid Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

Abstract: HypothesisThe tumor micro-environment and especially the different macrophage phenotypes appear to be of great influence on the behavior of multiple tumor types. M1 skewed macrophages possess anti-tumoral capacities, while the M2 polarized macrophages have pro-tumoral capacities. We analyzed if the macrophage count and the M2 to total macrophage ratio is a discriminative marker for outcome after surgery in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) and studied the prognostic value of these immunological cells.Method… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
74
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(36 reference statements)
2
74
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Up to date, this task has been accomplished using CD11c or NOS2 for M1 TAMs, and CD163, CD204, or CD206 for M2 TAMs. Indeed, increased M1 TAM densities seem to be associated with a favorable clinical outcome in NSCLC (Ma et al, 2010;Ohri et al, 2009), ovarian , colorectal (Edin et al, 2012), and gastric cancer (Zhang, Wang, et al, 2014a), while those of M2 are linked to poor prognosis in several tumors, including NSCLC (Hirayama et al, 2012;Ohtaki et al, 2010;Zeni et al, 2007), mesothelioma (Cornelissen et al, 2014), esophageal (Shigeoka et al, 2013), gastric cancer (Kawahara et al, 2010;Pantano et al, 2013), pancreatic (Hou et al, 2014;Ino et al, 2013;Kurahara et al, 2011;Sugimoto et al, 2014;Sugimura et al, 2015;Zeng et al, 2014), CRC (Herrera et al, 2013), HCC (Kong et al, 2013), Hodgkin lymphoma , renal (Dannenmann et al, 2013;Komohara et al, 2011;Xu et al, 2014), urothelial (Ichimura et al, 2014), breast (Medrek et al, 2012), endometrial (Kübler et al, 2014), ovarian (Lan et al, 2013), melanoma ( Jensen et al, 2009), and squamous oral carcinoma . Additionally, some studies have demonstrated that, when associated with poor clinical outcome, CD68 + cells are often correlated with the tumor microvessel density, in addition to HIF, VEGF (Chai et al, 2008), and matrix metalloproteinase expression (Bolat et al, 2006;Hanada et al, 2000;Leek et al, 1996;Osinsky et al, 2011;Valković et al, 2002), suggesting that they might have an ...…”
Section: Role Of Tumor-associated Macrophagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to date, this task has been accomplished using CD11c or NOS2 for M1 TAMs, and CD163, CD204, or CD206 for M2 TAMs. Indeed, increased M1 TAM densities seem to be associated with a favorable clinical outcome in NSCLC (Ma et al, 2010;Ohri et al, 2009), ovarian , colorectal (Edin et al, 2012), and gastric cancer (Zhang, Wang, et al, 2014a), while those of M2 are linked to poor prognosis in several tumors, including NSCLC (Hirayama et al, 2012;Ohtaki et al, 2010;Zeni et al, 2007), mesothelioma (Cornelissen et al, 2014), esophageal (Shigeoka et al, 2013), gastric cancer (Kawahara et al, 2010;Pantano et al, 2013), pancreatic (Hou et al, 2014;Ino et al, 2013;Kurahara et al, 2011;Sugimoto et al, 2014;Sugimura et al, 2015;Zeng et al, 2014), CRC (Herrera et al, 2013), HCC (Kong et al, 2013), Hodgkin lymphoma , renal (Dannenmann et al, 2013;Komohara et al, 2011;Xu et al, 2014), urothelial (Ichimura et al, 2014), breast (Medrek et al, 2012), endometrial (Kübler et al, 2014), ovarian (Lan et al, 2013), melanoma ( Jensen et al, 2009), and squamous oral carcinoma . Additionally, some studies have demonstrated that, when associated with poor clinical outcome, CD68 + cells are often correlated with the tumor microvessel density, in addition to HIF, VEGF (Chai et al, 2008), and matrix metalloproteinase expression (Bolat et al, 2006;Hanada et al, 2000;Leek et al, 1996;Osinsky et al, 2011;Valković et al, 2002), suggesting that they might have an ...…”
Section: Role Of Tumor-associated Macrophagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance in cancer, M1 macrophages are known to have tumoricidal functions, whereas M2-like macrophages aid tumor cells in evading destruction from host immune cells, and promote angiogenesis, invasion and metastasis. The majority of tumor-associated macrophages adopt an M2-like phenotype, and their presence in tumors has been directly correlated with poor prognosis 13,14 . Contrarily in atherosclerosis, M1 macrophages are commonly viewed as atherogenic, while M2 macrophages are seen as atheroprotective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mesothelioma, M2 macrophages with immunosuppressive features have been observed in the tumor; their ratio (CD163/ CD68) having a negative prognostic value. 20 The effect of sPE on skewing macrophage differentiation into M2 type has recently been demonstrated, 21,22 however, CD73 expression has not been studied on these cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%