1981
DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.1981.241.3.r203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ratio of central nervous system to body metabolism in vertebrates: its constancy and functional basis

Abstract: We present and document an hypothesis that healthy adults of most vertebrate species use 2-8% of their basal metabolism for the central nervous system (CNS). This relationship is constant across all classes of vertebrates, as we found by examining data from 42 species, including 3 fish, 3 amphibia, 2 reptiles, 6 birds, and 28 mammals. To explain its constancy, we hypothesize that an optimal functional relationship between the energy requirements of an animal's executor system (muscle metabolism) and its contro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
407
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 403 publications
(413 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(33 reference statements)
5
407
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The brain is one of the most energetically expensive organs in the vertebrate body; therefore, the large amount of energy required to maintain brain tissue should impose serious constraints on brain size evolution [37]. In fact, humans expend a much larger share of their resting energy budget on brain metabolism than other primates or nonprimate mammals.…”
Section: Energy Constraints For the Enlarging Brainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The brain is one of the most energetically expensive organs in the vertebrate body; therefore, the large amount of energy required to maintain brain tissue should impose serious constraints on brain size evolution [37]. In fact, humans expend a much larger share of their resting energy budget on brain metabolism than other primates or nonprimate mammals.…”
Section: Energy Constraints For the Enlarging Brainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has long been known that vertebrates exhibit extensive variation in brain size (Bauchot, Bauchot, Platel, & Ridet, 1977; Crile & Quiring, 1940; Jarvis et al., 2005; Mink, Blumenschine, & Adams, 1981; Striedter, 2005; Taylor & van Schaik, 2007). There are clear fitness benefits associated with a larger brain as brain size is positively correlated with increased intelligence, cognition, learning capability, population persistence, and decreased susceptibility to predation (Sol & Lefebvre, 2000; Tebbich & Bshary, 2004; Shultz & Dunbar, 2006a; Sol, Szekely, Liker, & Lefebvre, 2007; Sol, Bacher, Reader, & Lefebvre, 2008; Overington, Morand‐Ferron, Boogert, & Lefebvre, 2009; Barrickman, Bastian, Isler, & van Schaik, 2008; Amiel, Tingley, & Shine, 2011; Reader, Hager, & Laland, 2011; Kotrschal et al., 2013b; MacLean et al., 2014; Kotrschal et al., 2015a; Kotrschal, Corral‐Lopez, Amcoff, & Kolm, 2015b; Benson‐Amram, Dantzer, Stricker, Swanson, & Holekamp, 2016; but also see Drake, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key hypotheses, such as the expensive tissue hypothesis (i.e., expensive metabolic cost of brain tissue) (Aiello & Wheeler, 1995; Isler & van Schaik, 2009) and energy trade‐off hypothesis (increased encephalization leads to trade‐offs with other functions) (Isler & van Schaik, 2006a,b, 2009; Navarrete, van Schaik, & Isler, 2011; Tsuboi et al., 2015), recognize that brain tissue is costly and that fitness trade‐offs likely underlie increased encephalization (Aiello & Wheeler, 1995). Research has indeed shown that increased allocation to brain tissue leads to declines in other components of fitness (Kaufman, Hladik, & Pasquet, 2003; Kotrschal et al., 2013a; Mink et al., 1981; Navarrete et al., 2011; Raichle & Gusnard, 2002; Tsuboi et al., 2015). The observed costs and benefits of brain size, as well as the connections between brain size and fitness, foreshadow that variation in ecological factors have the potential to exert selection and influence observed patterns of brain size variation (Gittleman, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large brains are metabolically costly. Thus, humans allocate approximately 20% of their total energy to the brain, compared with 11-13% for apes and 2-8% for other mammalian species (2). This increased metabolic demand has been associated with elevated expression of genes involved in neuronal functions and energy metabolism (3,4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%