Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2645710.2645728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ratings meet reviews, a combined approach to recommend

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
215
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 289 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
215
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The typical side information includes social relationship, social tag, item description, etc. Our work is closely related to tag-based recommendation, review-based recommendation and item description-based recommendation (Agarwal and Chen, 2010;Liang et al, 2010;Gemmell et al, 2011;Ling et al, 2014).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The typical side information includes social relationship, social tag, item description, etc. Our work is closely related to tag-based recommendation, review-based recommendation and item description-based recommendation (Agarwal and Chen, 2010;Liang et al, 2010;Gemmell et al, 2011;Ling et al, 2014).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, there are several works that incorporated the review text into recommendation algorithms (McAuley and Leskovec, 2013;Bao et al, 2014;Diao et al, 2014;Ling et al, 2014). In McAuley and Leskovec (2013), the authors proposed a model named hidden factors as topics (HFT), which combined the objectives of matrix factorization and topic modeling together.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is particularly important for deep models such as RNNs, since these high-capacity models are prone to overfitting. Existing hybrid methods have used unsupervised learning objectives on text content to regularize the parameters of the recommendation model [4,23,24]. However, since we consume the text directly as an input for prediction, we can not use this approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%