2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2009.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rating the prison boss: Examining supervision among prison health care staff

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Health staff working in these settings often experience the challenge of dual loyalty—generally, the pressure that the security setting places on the health mission (Hemmens & Stohr, 2000). Whereas the role of security staff may be more clearly defined (e.g., to provide security and administer punishment), health care workers may feel as if their role is an amalgam of caring for patients and assisting security staff in maintaining order (Garland & McCarty, 2010). Moreover, ethical challenges exist in protecting medical records, maintaining confidentiality and integrity, and preventing misuse of medical information (Haag, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Health staff working in these settings often experience the challenge of dual loyalty—generally, the pressure that the security setting places on the health mission (Hemmens & Stohr, 2000). Whereas the role of security staff may be more clearly defined (e.g., to provide security and administer punishment), health care workers may feel as if their role is an amalgam of caring for patients and assisting security staff in maintaining order (Garland & McCarty, 2010). Moreover, ethical challenges exist in protecting medical records, maintaining confidentiality and integrity, and preventing misuse of medical information (Haag, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, ethical challenges exist in protecting medical records, maintaining confidentiality and integrity, and preventing misuse of medical information (Haag, 2006). In addition, health staff may view patients with suspicion because the health staff are frequent targets of patient-related lawsuits (Garland & McCarty, 2010). Although guidelines exist for promotion of ethical and high-quality care for incarcerated patients, the aforementioned challenges often impact the delivery of care and overall job satisfaction (Finney, Stergiopoulos, Hensel, Bonato, & Dewa, 2013; Roy & Avdija, 2012; Souryal, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, research should identify the causes of health care problems and service shortfalls. Such work could identify, for example, if low-quality implementation of services exists and whether it is due to inadequate coordination of services and treatment or some other reason (Garlanda & McCarty, 2010). Studies that pursue this line of work also can help to identify whether existing efforts are sufficient or what types of new efforts may be warranted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compliance with treatment regimes cannot be assumed; indeed, inmates and ex-prisoners may resist treatment (Hammett et al, 2001). Steps such as ensuring adequate supplies of medication and supporting correctional system health care staff may reduce these possibilities (Garlanda & McCarty, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other research has examined perceptions of supervision in prisons. Consistent with Saylor and Wright (1992), three studies-one on federal correctional officers (Britton, 1997), another on correctional officers in a western state (Jurik, Halemba, Musheno, & Boyle, 1987), and a study on health care staff in federal prisons (Garland & McCarty, 2010)-observed that greater amounts of correctional experience led to less positive opinions of supervision. One explanation proposed for this relationship is that people become more cynical and hardened over time and thereby develop less favorable views of supervisor performance as a result .…”
Section: Explaining Perceptions Of Supervision and Organizational Functioning In Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 96%