2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(99)00167-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rating of Indian commercial banks: A DEA approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
106
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
106
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The latest framework is known as "Narasimhan Committee (1991)" (Saha & Ravisankar, 2000). In 1996, the committee addressed the globalization issue in their policy implication and decided as "to chart a program of banking sector reforms necessary to strengthen Indian's banking system and make it internationally competitive…."…”
Section: Overview Of Indian Private Sector Banksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The latest framework is known as "Narasimhan Committee (1991)" (Saha & Ravisankar, 2000). In 1996, the committee addressed the globalization issue in their policy implication and decided as "to chart a program of banking sector reforms necessary to strengthen Indian's banking system and make it internationally competitive…."…”
Section: Overview Of Indian Private Sector Banksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Narasimhan Committee, 1996, p. 261). The performance and efficiency of banking sector can easily be traced from the market perception of premium charged by the banks and their involvement in public issues (Saha & Ravisankar, 2000). However, the Indian banking sector is over saturated by the public banks and hence the efficiency analysis of the private sector banks is essential to examine banks' performance in a restricted and highly regulated condition.…”
Section: Overview Of Indian Private Sector Banksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, the intermediation approach treated banks as an intermediary, transferring financial assets from the surplus units to the deficit units. Among the studies that followed this approach includes Charnes et al (1990), Humphrey (1991), Wheelock andWilson (1995b), Miller and Noulas (1996), Haslem and Scheraga (1999) and Saha and Ravisankar (2000), to name a few. Latly, there is another modern approach which mix up the To gauge for technological innovation, the input vectors employed in this study covered the number of branches, number of staff, number of ATM machines, number of cash deposit machine, number of cheque deposit machine, number of cheque scan machine, and number of passbook update machine.…”
Section: Dea Efficiency Studies On Malaysian Banksmentioning
confidence: 99%