2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-00256-z
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rather than inducing psychological reactance, requiring vaccination strengthens intentions to vaccinate in US populations

Abstract: In a survey and three experiments (one preregistered with a nationally representative sample), we examined if vaccination requirements are likely to backfire, as commonly feared. We investigated if relative to encouraging free choice in vaccination, requiring a vaccine weakens or strengthens vaccination intentions, both in general and among individuals with a predisposition to experience psychological reactance. In the four studies, compared to free choice, requirements strengthened vaccination intentions acro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(16 reference statements)
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite arguments (discussed above) that that employer mandates and financial incentives are likely to decrease the proportion of a population that wants to vaccinate, the current data suggest that this is unlikely. Compared to the low base rate of the control group, neither policy decreased the proportion that would want to vaccinate, which is consistent with results from prior studies that examined COVID-19 vaccine mandates [5] or financial incentives [13] , [14] , [15] , [16] , [17] , [27] . Instead, employer mandates and financial incentives had positive psychological effects, increasing the proportion that wanted to vaccinate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite arguments (discussed above) that that employer mandates and financial incentives are likely to decrease the proportion of a population that wants to vaccinate, the current data suggest that this is unlikely. Compared to the low base rate of the control group, neither policy decreased the proportion that would want to vaccinate, which is consistent with results from prior studies that examined COVID-19 vaccine mandates [5] or financial incentives [13] , [14] , [15] , [16] , [17] , [27] . Instead, employer mandates and financial incentives had positive psychological effects, increasing the proportion that wanted to vaccinate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…According to the theory called psychological reactance, people may resist a requirement they perceive as curtailing their freedom [3] , [4] . Although there are few empirical tests relevant to COVID-19 vaccination mandates, the evidence does not appear to support this concern [5] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One strategy could be a mandatory vaccination requirement for the general public. Albarracin and colleagues found that such a strategy did not result in a backlash against vaccination in the United States [ 71 ]. Whether similar findings can be reported in reality and in other countries needs further analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although studies suggest that current policies are likely to increase population-level vaccination rates to some degree,36–39 gains were largest in those under 30 years old (a very low-risk group) and in countries with below average uptake 36. Moreover, insights from behavioural psychology suggest that these policies are likely to entrench distrust and provoke reactance —a motivation to counter an unreasonable threat to one’s freedom.…”
Section: What Can We Learn From the Behavioural Sciences?mentioning
confidence: 99%