1958
DOI: 10.1021/ja01551a053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rates of Solvolysis of Substituted Phenyldimethylcarbinyl Chlorides in Methyl, Ethyl and Isopropyl Alcohols. Influence of the Solvent on the Value of the Electrophilic Substituent Constant1,2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While it is anticipated that an acid-catalyzed process would have a developing positive charge, the large magnitude of this influence was certainly surprising. As a point of comparison, the ρ + value for the solvolysis of cumyl chloride is −4.45, 48 which is considered to be an S N 1-like process, supporting the strong developing positive charge at the benzylic position in the transition state in acetal degradation. ( ii ) The relative positioning of the ketal moiety and the electron-withdrawing amido group can greatly influence its degradation, in that there is a two orders of magnitude difference in the cleavage rates of 2- and 6- carbon linkers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…While it is anticipated that an acid-catalyzed process would have a developing positive charge, the large magnitude of this influence was certainly surprising. As a point of comparison, the ρ + value for the solvolysis of cumyl chloride is −4.45, 48 which is considered to be an S N 1-like process, supporting the strong developing positive charge at the benzylic position in the transition state in acetal degradation. ( ii ) The relative positioning of the ketal moiety and the electron-withdrawing amido group can greatly influence its degradation, in that there is a two orders of magnitude difference in the cleavage rates of 2- and 6- carbon linkers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…As Equation (2) includes both solvent and substituent effects on solvolytic reactivity, comparisons with simpler equations are important. Comparisons were made briefly with the Hammett–Brown11a, b ( ρ + σ + ) treatments of substituent effects,8a and various Grunwald–Winstein ( mY )12 correlations for solvent effects were shown 8b. Connections between Equation (2) and simpler equations11, 12 will now be explored further.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data were used to determine s values using the expression s = log (k/k H )/ r, where r = À4.82 in methanol. 6 The rate retardation seen in the meta-derivative 10 corresponds to a s value of 0.20 for m-CH=N(O)-t-Bu (which is identical with the s I value). The more interesting rate behavior is seen in the p-CH=N(O)-t-Bu derivative 9, which is actually more reactive than the unsubstituted cumyl chloride 11.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Taft S I Value For Ch=n(o)-t-bumentioning
confidence: 70%