2008
DOI: 10.2112/04-0375.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rates of Shoreline Progradation during the Last 1700 Years at Beachmere, Southeastern Queensland, Australia, Based on Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dating of Beach Ridges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…OSL has also been used successfully to date relict foredune ridge plains in Australia since the early 2000's (Brooke et al, 2008a(Brooke et al, , 2008bForsyth et al, 2010;Forsyth et al, 2012;Goodwin et al, 2006;Murray-Wallace et al, 2002;Nott et al, 2009). These studies have focused on northern NSW and Queensland, with the exception of Guichen Bay in South Australia.…”
Section: Luminescence Dating Of Coastal Faciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…OSL has also been used successfully to date relict foredune ridge plains in Australia since the early 2000's (Brooke et al, 2008a(Brooke et al, , 2008bForsyth et al, 2010;Forsyth et al, 2012;Goodwin et al, 2006;Murray-Wallace et al, 2002;Nott et al, 2009). These studies have focused on northern NSW and Queensland, with the exception of Guichen Bay in South Australia.…”
Section: Luminescence Dating Of Coastal Faciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broader scale patterns of Holocene infill and rates of shoreline progradation have also been examined (Brooke et al, 2008a;Goodwin et al, 2006). Radiocarbon dating is particularly suited to calcareous ridge plains, such as Guichen Bay, where biogenic carbonate material is being actively produced in the nearshore environment and reworked into the beach face facies (hence reasonable agreement of OSL and radiocarbon ages in the seaward portion of the barrier), but is not ideal for carbonate-poor sites such as Moruya, where deeper cores were required to recover shell fragments from the nearshore facies.…”
Section: Luminescence Dating Of Coastal Faciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combined 14 C and OLS dating provided a robust and consistent chronological framework for these phases, which substantially improved the existing chronology based on radiocarbon-dated shell material (Aguayo et al, 1999 Figure 12. Periodicities of beach-ridge formation for the Usumacinta-Grijalva (Us-Gr) system compared with reported or estimated values for other large beach-ridge systems: Rockingham Bay (Forsyth et al, 2010), Beachmere (Brooke et al, 2008b), Moruya (Oliver et al, 2015), Guichen Bay (Murray Wallace et al, 2002;Bristow and Pucillo, 2006), Keppel Bay (Brooke et al, 2008a), Shark Bay (Nott, 2011), Cowley Beach (Nott et al, 2009), Lake Michigan (Thompson, 1992), St. Vincent Island (Lopez and Rink, 2008;Rink and Lopez, 2010), Jerup (Nielsen et al, 2006), Nayarit (Curray et al, 1969), and Rio Grande do Sul (Milana et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These ages reveal that relative sea level at Beachmere was approximately 1 m higher than present 1,700 ± 140 years BP. Shortly after (1,140 years BP) and up until approximately 140 years ago, there was a linear rate of shoreline progradation of 0.40 m per year, an apparent increase from around 0.16 m per year for the period 1700-1140 years BP (Brooke et al 2008). …”
Section: Surface Water and Drainage Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%