1964
DOI: 10.1029/jz069i016p03395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rates of regional denudation in the United States

Abstract: Data, in large part collected since World War II, allow a recalculation of the rates of regional erosion in the United States. These data indicate a rate of denudation for

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
69
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
10
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Annual sediment production from mass wasting in the Pacific Northwest, one of the most rapidly eroding regions in the United States (Judson and Ritter, 1964), ranges from 9-72 m 3 /km 2 /year for forested watersheds and 22-3500 m 3 /km 2 /year for logged and roaded watersheds (Roberts and Church, 1986). In this study, we estimated an annual mass wasting rate of 13 m 3 / km 2 /year using two sets of aerial photographs spanning 62 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Annual sediment production from mass wasting in the Pacific Northwest, one of the most rapidly eroding regions in the United States (Judson and Ritter, 1964), ranges from 9-72 m 3 /km 2 /year for forested watersheds and 22-3500 m 3 /km 2 /year for logged and roaded watersheds (Roberts and Church, 1986). In this study, we estimated an annual mass wasting rate of 13 m 3 / km 2 /year using two sets of aerial photographs spanning 62 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unsurprisingly, the R pattern is reminiscent of both annual mean P and intensity, but some details are different, such as the very high values of R in southern Florida. This pattern differs from that of erosion itself, as steep topography favors erosion in most of the western US (Judson and Ritter, 1964) and land-use practices enhance or mitigate the effect of erosive rainfall (Gyssels et al, 2005;Montgomery, 2007).…”
Section: Erosivity Calculations Using Observed Daily Rainfallmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Weathering and erosion are not uniformly active over the continental areas. Apart from climatically based inequalities in the rates at which these processes act (e.g., Corbel 1959;Judson and Ritter 1964), field evidence suggests that although major rivers and streams effectively erode their beds and banks, interfluves may be degraded much more slowly: they are "out of reach of erosion" (Knopf 1924, p. 637) or in zones of nil erosion (Knopf 1924;Crickmay 1932Crickmay , 1976Horton 1945). Degradational processes may not be evenly distributed over the land surface in all conditions (cf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%