Rates of Postoperative Complications and Approach-related Neurological Symptoms After L4–L5 Lateral Transpsoas Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared With Upper Lumbar Levels

Abstract

Study Design: This was a retrospective comparative study. Objective: To compare the likelihood of approach-related complications for patients undergoing single-level lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) at L4–L5 to those undergoing the procedure at upper lumbar levels. Summary of Background Data: LLIF has been associated with a number of advantages when compared with traditional interbody fusion techniques. However, potential risks with the approach include vascular or visceral injury, thigh dysesthesias, and lumbar plexus injury. There are concerns of a higher risk of these complications at the L4–L5 level compared with upper lumbar levels. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort review was completed for consecutive patients undergoing single-level LLIF between 2004 and 2019 by a single surgeon. Indication for surgery was symptomatic degenerative lumbar stenosis and/or spondylolisthesis. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: LLIF at L4–L5 versus a single level between L1 and L4. Baseline characteristics, intraoperative complications, postoperative approach-related neurological symptoms, and patient-reported outcomes were compared and analyzed between the cohorts. Results: A total of 122 were included in analysis, of which 58 underwent LLIF at L4–L5 and 64 underwent LLIF between L1 and L4. There were no visceral or vascular injuries or lumbar plexus injuries in either cohort. There was no significant difference in the rate of postoperative hip pain, anterior thigh dysesthesias, and/or hip flexor weakness between the cohorts (53.5% L4–L5 vs. 37.5% L1–L4; P=0.102). All patients reported complete resolution of these symptoms by 6-month postoperative follow-up. Discussion: LLIF surgery at the L4–L5 level is associated with a similar infrequent likelihood of approach-related complications and postoperative hip pain, thigh dysesthesias, and hip flexor weakness when compared with upper lumbar level LLIF. Careful patient selection, meticulous use of real-time neuromonitoring, and an understanding of the anatomic location of the lumbar plexus to the working corridor are critical to success.

Global research trends in lumbar lateral interbody fusion (LLIF): a bibliometric and visualization study

“…These studies provide valuable insights for shaping future research directions. Notably, complications, interbody fusion, spine, surgical procedures, and surgical outcomes are prevalent and hold a significant position in the co-occurrence network graph [25]. Therefore, further high-quality research is imperative in these three areas.…”