Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2020
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.03041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rates and Microbial Players of Iron-Driven Anaerobic Oxidation of Methane in Methanic Marine Sediments

Abstract: The flux of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, from the seabed is largely controlled by anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) coupled to sulfate reduction (S-AOM) in the sulfate methane transition (SMT). S-AOM is estimated to oxidize 90% of the methane produced in marine sediments and is mediated by a consortium of anaerobic methanotrophic archaea (ANME) and sulfate reducing bacteria. An additional methane sink, i.e., iron oxide coupled AOM (Fe-AOM), has been suggested to be active in the methanic zone of marine… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
68
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
(183 reference statements)
4
68
4
Order By: Relevance
“…There are indications for microbial iron reduction in the deep methanic zone highlighted by the detection of dissolved Fe 2+ in pore water [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]19]. Of the various microbial processes that could hypothetically fuel iron reduction in the deep methanic zone, iron oxide dependent anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) has been demonstrated [19]. Likewise, dissimilatory iron reduction is feasible but requires similar electron donors (acetate and H 2 ) as methanogenesis [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are indications for microbial iron reduction in the deep methanic zone highlighted by the detection of dissolved Fe 2+ in pore water [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]19]. Of the various microbial processes that could hypothetically fuel iron reduction in the deep methanic zone, iron oxide dependent anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) has been demonstrated [19]. Likewise, dissimilatory iron reduction is feasible but requires similar electron donors (acetate and H 2 ) as methanogenesis [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, we investigated the Helgoland Mud Area (HMA) in the North Sea, which is characterized by high accumulation of fine-grained sediments with elevated Fe 2+ pore-water concentrations in the methanic zone [6,19,28]. We characterised the composition of the bio-available fraction of the organic matter utilized by the microbial communities therein [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methane peak in the methanic zone of Unit VII coincides with high amounts of all Fe oxide fractions and pyrite (Figures F2, F3). Because Fe 2+ concentrations increase with depth throughout Unit VI, methane is potentially consumed by the anaerobic oxidation with Fe oxides (e.g., Egger et al, 2015bEgger et al, , 2017Aromokeye et al, 2020). The availability of pyrite at the Unit VII/VI boundary may indicate that sulfate and Fe oxides have been concurrently reduced during the anaerobic oxidation of methane, resulting in the formation of pyrite via metastable Fe monosulfides.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The abundance of Fe sulfides in anoxic sediments is mostly dependent on the availability of (1) pore water sulfide released during organoclastic sulfate reduction and through AOM with sulfate and, concomitantly, (2) pore water Fe released during organoclastic Fe oxide reduction and through Fe-mediated AOM as well as the content of reactive solid-phase Fe as scavengers for the produced pore water sulfide (e.g., Goldhaber and Kaplan, 1974;Jørgensen, 1977Jørgensen, , 1982Berner, 1984;Egger et al, 2015bEgger et al, , 2017Oni et al, 2015;Aromokeye et al, 2020). Via the accumulation of intermediate metastable Fe monosulfides (mackinawite and greigite) (Rickard, 1995), pyrite can be formed through the reaction of Fe monosulfides with sulfides (Rickard, 1997;Thiel et al, 2019), polysulfides, and S 0 (Berner, 1970;Rickard, 1975;Luther, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iron oxides are globally distributed in marine costal sediments (4). Anaerobic oxidation of methane coupled to iron reduction (Fe-AOM) is hypothesized to account for elevated dissolved iron concentrations in methanic zones, particularly in the Baltic and Bothnian Sea, North Sea and Black Sea (4). However, despite strong biogeochemical evidence for Fe-AOM (5-7), this remains one of the least elucidated methane-cycling metabolisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%