2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00208-007-0133-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate of Type II blowup for a semilinear heat equation

Abstract: A solution u of a Cauchy problem for a semilinear heat equationLet ϕ ∞ be the radially symmetric singular steady state. Suppose that u 0 ∈ L ∞ is a radially symmetric function such that u 0 − ϕ ∞ and (u 0 ) t change sign at most finitely many times. We determine the exact blowup rate of Type II blowup solution with

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
90
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An important feature of Type II singularity is that the rates are not unique. This can be seen in the construction of solutions with different rates in [19,20,25,13]. We note that (1.8) has been proved by Conner and Grant [5] in one space dimensional case with Ω = (0, 1), under the assumption u 0 > 0 in (0, 1) so that the solution is monotonically increasing in x.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An important feature of Type II singularity is that the rates are not unique. This can be seen in the construction of solutions with different rates in [19,20,25,13]. We note that (1.8) has been proved by Conner and Grant [5] in one space dimensional case with Ω = (0, 1), under the assumption u 0 > 0 in (0, 1) so that the solution is monotonically increasing in x.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…We call such type of blowup as Type II blowup; see also [25]. Indeed, this type II singularity is also found in the dead-core problem (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…[3,5]), or that the solution is monotone in time. Indeed, for large p, even in the particular case of the scalar problem, there exist radial nonincreasing, single-point blow-up solutions of type II (i.e., such that (1.7) fails); see [10,11,13]. As for the case of monotone in time solutions, it seems that the known proofs of (1.7) for systems (see e.g.…”
Section: Problem and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such new Type II blow-up patterns for the semilinear heat equation (6.22) were constructed earlier in [37]; see [46] for extra details. We apply this method to the higher-order equation (1.9), which will require completely different spectral theory and related mathematical tools of matching.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 79%