Estuarine and Wetland Processes 1980
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-5177-2_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate of Sedimentation and Its Role in Nutrient Cycling in a Louisiana Salt Marsh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sediments consisting of clay-sized particles (containing Fe, Al, Ca) may directly deposit particulate P in the wetland as well as provide new sorption sites for water soluble P (Cooper and Gilliam, 1987 , 1981). DeLaune and Patrick (1980) reported that sedimentation contributed 2.3 g p/m2/yr to a rapidly accreting (1.1 cm/yr) salt marsh. Likewise, Johnston et al (1984) reported high rates of P deposition (2.6 g/m2/yr) in a rapidly accreting (2.4 cm/yr) freshwater marsh.…”
Section: Sedimentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sediments consisting of clay-sized particles (containing Fe, Al, Ca) may directly deposit particulate P in the wetland as well as provide new sorption sites for water soluble P (Cooper and Gilliam, 1987 , 1981). DeLaune and Patrick (1980) reported that sedimentation contributed 2.3 g p/m2/yr to a rapidly accreting (1.1 cm/yr) salt marsh. Likewise, Johnston et al (1984) reported high rates of P deposition (2.6 g/m2/yr) in a rapidly accreting (2.4 cm/yr) freshwater marsh.…”
Section: Sedimentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If bulk densities above 0.20 gcm ~ are essential for growth of S. alterniflora, as suggested by DeLaune and Patrick (1980), then only the reference marsh provides the soil density conditions necessary to support salt marsh plant growth (0.27 _ 0.01 gcm vs. 0.17 + 0.01 g cm ~ in the managed marsh). Soils with a higher mineral content (i,e., bulk density) not only have a greater ability to sorb plant nutrients (Mitsch and Gosselink 1993), but also have been shown to provide more nutrients on a per volume basis relative to more organic salt marsh soils (DeLaune et al 1979).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%