2019
DOI: 10.1111/jocs.14164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate of reoperation at 1 year for aortic repair vs replacement in aortic regurgitation. A trial sequence analysis of published meta‐analysis results

Abstract: The pooled estimate of a recent meta‐analysis concluded that rate of reoperation at 1 year was significantly higher in Aortic valve repair (8.82% vs 3.70%) as compared with aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic regurgitation (odds ratio = 2.67, 95% confidence interval [1.08, 3.62], P = .03). We performed a trial sequential analysis using the published data of the meta‐analysis and found the evidence is not strong enough for the conclusion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Publication Types

Select...

Relationship

0
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 0 publications
references
References 14 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance

No citations

Set email alert for when this publication receives citations?