1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf01437830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate of radiated power loss with different statistical distributions

Abstract: Abstract.We compute the energy emitted in the radiative recombination process (or radiated power loss) of point particles of charge Ze and -Z'e with nonrelativistic velocities and reduced mass M, useful in a great variety of problems, averaged over Maxwellian and nonMaxwellian distributions. This has been accomplished using a recent parametrization, obtained by us, of the nonrelativistic, radiative recombination cross section in the dipole approximation, valid for all values of the energy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We suggest a uniform parametrizations for the total emission coefficient and for transition to the first level They have the accuracy better than 1.4% and 1.6%, respectively, in the entire range of temperatures. In [61], Erdas and Quarati presented results of tabulation of the emission coefficient in a wider interval 10 −6 <T/J Z <10 8 , but we concluded that these authors overestimated q rr by 5%-70% in the range 3×10 −4 < T/J Z <1. Note also that evaluating the rate and emission coefficients for T/J Z  10 5 have no practical meaning since non-relativistic theory of recombination is not applicable at so large temperatures.…”
Section: The Emission Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We suggest a uniform parametrizations for the total emission coefficient and for transition to the first level They have the accuracy better than 1.4% and 1.6%, respectively, in the entire range of temperatures. In [61], Erdas and Quarati presented results of tabulation of the emission coefficient in a wider interval 10 −6 <T/J Z <10 8 , but we concluded that these authors overestimated q rr by 5%-70% in the range 3×10 −4 < T/J Z <1. Note also that evaluating the rate and emission coefficients for T/J Z  10 5 have no practical meaning since non-relativistic theory of recombination is not applicable at so large temperatures.…”
Section: The Emission Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Further studies of RR cross sections, effective radiation, rate and emission coefficients following Seaton's work are given in [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62], where the coefficients for hydrogen-like ions were calculated in [49,[56][57][58][59][60][61][62]. In particular, accurate piecewisecontinuous parametrization for the total cross section is proposed by Erdas and coauthors in [60] (whereas their parametrization of the total effective radiation coefficient seems erroneous).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation