Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2002
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2002.577.45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate of PPV Infection of Some Plum Cultivars Depending on Rootstock and Management Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results confirm the high sensitivity of the main Japanese plum cultivars ‘Black Amber’, ‘Black Beaut’, ‘Black Gold’, ‘Fortune’, ‘Golden Japan’, ‘Ozark Premier’, ‘Red Beaut’, and ‘Santa Rosa’ previously described in this species (Dragoiski et al. 2002, Pascal et al.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results confirm the high sensitivity of the main Japanese plum cultivars ‘Black Amber’, ‘Black Beaut’, ‘Black Gold’, ‘Fortune’, ‘Golden Japan’, ‘Ozark Premier’, ‘Red Beaut’, and ‘Santa Rosa’ previously described in this species (Dragoiski et al. 2002, Pascal et al.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…1996, Hartmann and Neumüller 2006). In European plum, a large body of information exists about the behaviour of the cultivars against PPV, but in other plum species, data are very scarce (Dragoiski et al. 2002, Pascal et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dragoiski et al (2002) observed a different speed of disease spread between different plum cultivar/rootstock combinations in the field. Finally, Blazek et al (2003) did not find any influence of the rootstock on the behaviour of the cultivars against PPV and the spread of disease in plum orchards.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Additionally, a possible interaction between the resistance/ susceptibility level of the scion and the rootstock was suggested by Sutic (1971) and Audergon et al (1995) in field studies on apricot, but conclusive results were not obtained. Dragoiski et al (2002) observed a different speed of disease spread between different plum cultivar/rootstock combinations in the field. Finally, Blazek et al (2003) did not find any influence of the rootstock on the behaviour of the cultivars against PPV and the spread of disease in plum orchards.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%