1987
DOI: 10.1080/00103628709367912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate of nitrapyrin and soil ph effects on nitrification of ammonium fertilizer and growth and composition of burley tobacco

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concentrations of NO 3 − -N in the soils of urea + nitrapyrin treatment across the pH gradient at day 28 were lower than those in the soils of urea treatment at corresponding pH levels, and the net nitrification rates in the soils of urea + nitrapyrin treatment across the pH gradient were also lower than those in the soils of urea treatment (Table 1), indicating that nitrapyrin inhibited nitrification and its inhibitory effect varied with soil pH. This is consistent with the finding reported previously (Hall 1984; Chancy and Kamprath 1982; Degenhardt et al 2016; Sims and MacKown 1987; Touchton et al 1979; Hendrickson and Keeney 1979). For example, (Hendrickson and Keeney 1979) found that the inhibitory efficiency of nitrapyrin increased with soil pH.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The concentrations of NO 3 − -N in the soils of urea + nitrapyrin treatment across the pH gradient at day 28 were lower than those in the soils of urea treatment at corresponding pH levels, and the net nitrification rates in the soils of urea + nitrapyrin treatment across the pH gradient were also lower than those in the soils of urea treatment (Table 1), indicating that nitrapyrin inhibited nitrification and its inhibitory effect varied with soil pH. This is consistent with the finding reported previously (Hall 1984; Chancy and Kamprath 1982; Degenhardt et al 2016; Sims and MacKown 1987; Touchton et al 1979; Hendrickson and Keeney 1979). For example, (Hendrickson and Keeney 1979) found that the inhibitory efficiency of nitrapyrin increased with soil pH.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Previous research indicated the NI would function at least 91 d under the conditions of these experiments (Kelley and Bock, 1986). At the concentration applied, the NI is not itself beneficial to plant growth (Geronimo et al, 1973;Sims and MacKown, 1987); therefore, plant response to the + NI treatments was ascribed to the effects of the NI on soil-NH 4 concentrations.…”
Section: Soil Nitrogenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of NO3 source of N fertilizer or low rates of nitrapyrin (<2.24 kg ha" 1 ) to Maury soil in the field decreased surface soil acidification and concentration of plant Mn, but increased plant dry weight early in the growing season. The magnitude of treatment effects was not as great on any measured parameter as had been noted earlier in greenhouse tests 11 . However, the results were in the positive direction and it may be speculated that more dramatic results could have occurred on a soil of lower initial pH and less buffering capacity.…”
Section: Effects On Cured Leaf Yield and Valuementioning
confidence: 65%