1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf03186018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate of gastric digestion in the larvicidal fishesAplocheilus lineatus (Cuv. & Val.) andMacropodus cupanus (Cuv. & Val.)

Abstract: In the larvicidal fishes Aplocheilus lineatus and Macropodus cupanus investigations on the rate of gastric digestion reveal that interspecific variations are apparent; however, within the species, digestion rate is not significantly altered by fish size provided the amount of food supplied is sufficient to fill the stomach. Gastric depletion is directly related to temperature, increasing temperature elevating the rate of digestion. W 1976 Temperature and rate of gastric evacuation by Rainbow Trout, Salmo gaird… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within species, satiation amount is dependent on stomach capacity, which in turn varies according to the size of the fish. The present study indicates that as fish size increases satiation time increases and satiation amount decreases, in agreement with earlier reports (Brett, 1971;Jacob & Nair, 1981). The percentage body weight of food consumed by the fry, fingerlings and adults was 25-2%, 5.8% and 3.85% respectively (Table 11) and this negative relationship has been reported previously in other fishes (Brett, 1971;Jacob & Nair, 1981).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Within species, satiation amount is dependent on stomach capacity, which in turn varies according to the size of the fish. The present study indicates that as fish size increases satiation time increases and satiation amount decreases, in agreement with earlier reports (Brett, 1971;Jacob & Nair, 1981). The percentage body weight of food consumed by the fry, fingerlings and adults was 25-2%, 5.8% and 3.85% respectively (Table 11) and this negative relationship has been reported previously in other fishes (Brett, 1971;Jacob & Nair, 1981).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Fry (0.1-1 g) consumed an average of 2 1 mosquito larvae per fish in one meal while fingerlings (1-2 g)consumedanaverageof49mosquito larvaeperfish. Thesevalues are comparable and in some cases higher than those reported for fishes recognized as predators on mosquito larvae like Macropodus cupanus (Valenciennes) (Menon & Rajagopalan, 1977;Jacob & Nair, 1981), Gambusia afJinis (Baird and Girard) (Reddy, 1973); Aplocheilus lineatus (Cuvier and Valenciennes) (Jacob & Nair,198 1) and Poecilia reticulata (Peters) (Reddy, 1973). Hence the positive role played by the young of this fish in controlling mosquito larvae seems to be as important as other larvicidal fishes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation