Rate of Development of Viability Mutants in Drosophila melanogaster

Bonnier, Gert; Jonsson, Ulla B.

doi:10.2307/2405790

Cited by 7 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Dobzhansky and Wallace (1953), and Lerner ( 1954) suggested that heterozygotes are more uniformly successful in a variety of environments than are homozygotes, while Lewontin (1957) generalized by suggesting that greater mean fitness over a number of environments will be generally associated with low variance in fitness. Negative correlations between mean viability (determined over a number of environments) and variability were found by Dobzhansky and Levene (1955), Bonnier andJonsson (1957), andSpassky, Spassky, Pavlovsky, Krimbas, Krimbas, andDobzhansky ( 1960).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 65%

The Estimation of Relative Fitness of Drosophila Populations. II. Experimental Evaluation of Factors Affecting Fitness

Barker¹

1963

Evolution

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 65%

The Estimation of Relative Fitness of Drosophila Populations. II. Experimental Evaluation of Factors Affecting Fitness

Barker¹

1963

Evolution

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Dobzhansky and Wallace (1953), and Lerner (1954) suggested that heterozygotes are more uniformly successful in a variety of environments than are homozygotes, while Lewontin (1957) generalized by suggesting that greater mean fitness over a number of environments will be generally associated with low variance in fitness. Negative correlations between mean viability (determined over a number of environments) and variability were found by Dobzhansky and Levene (1955), Bonnier and Jonsson (1957), and Spassky, Spassky, Pavlovsky, Krimbas, Krimbas, and Dobzhansky (1960).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 74%

THE ESTIMATION OF RELATIVE FITNESS OF DROSOPHILA POPULATIONS. II. EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF FACTORS AFFECTING FITNESS

Barker

1963

Evolution

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…And, as a matter of fact, several of our strains -though showing in F 3 a percent of wild type flies larger than subvitals should do according to the definition of subvitality -were non-normal in other respects. Among other things their rate of development had a larger variance than the ,truer normals (BONNIER and JONSSON 1957).…”

Section: 32 G E H T Bonnier a N D Ulla B Jonssonmentioning

confidence: 91%

“…(This strains is in Table 2 classified as subvital). With regard to both of these strains it was known that the wild type flies showed a retarded development (BONNIER and JONSSON 1957). Table 8 shows the result.…”

Section: Larval Competition Testsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Studies on X-Ray Induced Detrimentals in the Second Chromosome of Drosophila Melanogaster

Bonnier¹,

Jonsson²

2010

Hereditas

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

HE great majority of experiments with Drosophila on radiation T induced mutations centers about questions of lethal mutations.Several investigations are, however, also made on mutations with less drastic effects, and it seems as if, during the last decade, the interest has switched over to mutations of this kind. The present investigation deals with different questions concerning x-ray induced subvitals in the second chromosome of D. melanogaster. The frequency of such mutations are considered and the comparisons made are in some instances also combined with the effects of different degrees of environmental stresses. MATERIALThe wild type flies used in the experiments were extracted from a Canton S stock. The flies were first made co-isogenic by making the crosses outlined in Fig. 1. As may be seen, (matings 1-5) the second chromosome al* Cy It" spa (abbreviated Cy) was used as marker and crossing over suppressor during the isogenisation. Later it was substituted by the chromosome al' Cy It" L' spa (abbreviated Cy L ; Fig. 1, mating 6 and onwards). The matings 1, 2, 3 and 4 were made in several replicates. In one of these the progeny of mating 4 was 26+, 53 Cy, 49 D 89 Cy D, which is in good agreement with the expected proportions 1: 2: 2: 4 (P between 0.7 and 0.8). The parents of mating 5 showed in this replicate good fertility; this replicate was, therefore, used as the foundation stock from which all ))wild type, chromosomes of the present study emanate. In a sideline the chromosomes al' Cy It" sps and ru h D8 Ins CXF ca (abbreviated Cy D) were retained on the male side

show abstract

Rate of Development of Viability Mutants in Drosophila melanogaster

Cited by 7 publications

References 0 publications

The Estimation of Relative Fitness of Drosophila Populations. II. Experimental Evaluation of Factors Affecting Fitness

The Estimation of Relative Fitness of Drosophila Populations. II. Experimental Evaluation of Factors Affecting Fitness

THE ESTIMATION OF RELATIVE FITNESS OF DROSOPHILA POPULATIONS. II. EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF FACTORS AFFECTING FITNESS

Studies on X-Ray Induced Detrimentals in the Second Chromosome of Drosophila Melanogaster

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About