1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf01000217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate of convergence in the strong law of large numbers for martingales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Łagodowski and Rychlik studied in [10] the convergence of the series (1) when {X n , n 1} is a martingale difference sequence (in short MDS); in particular, if p = r = 2, their results prove that the series (1) converges for any MDS bounded in L 2 , i.e., satisfying sup n 1 E( X 2 n ) < ∞. Stoica proved in [15] that, if 0 < r < 2 < p, then the series (1) converges for any MDS bounded in L p , i.e., satisfying sup n 1 E(| X n | p ) < ∞.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Łagodowski and Rychlik studied in [10] the convergence of the series (1) when {X n , n 1} is a martingale difference sequence (in short MDS); in particular, if p = r = 2, their results prove that the series (1) converges for any MDS bounded in L 2 , i.e., satisfying sup n 1 E( X 2 n ) < ∞. Stoica proved in [15] that, if 0 < r < 2 < p, then the series (1) converges for any MDS bounded in L p , i.e., satisfying sup n 1 E(| X n | p ) < ∞.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Most results concerning rate of convergence in the Marcinkiewicz SLLN for martingales were obtained in the onedimensional case. We refer to Lagodowski and Rychlik [11], Elton [5], Lesigne and Volny [13], Stoica [26] and Ghosal and Chandra [7] for martingale arrays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Łagodowski and Rychlik [12] studied the convergence of the series in (1.3) when fX n ; n $ 1} is a martingale difference sequence, in particular, if p ¼ r ¼ 2, their results show that the series in (1.3) converges for any martingale difference sequence bounded in L 2 (i.e. satisfying sup n$1 EX 2 n , 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%