2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.11.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate of Bone Mineral Density Testing and Subsequent Fracture-Free Interval After Distal Forearm Fracture in the Medicare Population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A few recent studies helped to inform our care of the patient with a distal radial fracture. The rate of routine bone mineral density testing in patients with a distal radial fracture remains unacceptably low despite its value 34 . Patients who underwent testing after a fracture had a longer fracture-free interval (819 days) compared with those who did not have testing (579 days), once again highlighting the importance of early intervention.…”
Section: Wrist Traumamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few recent studies helped to inform our care of the patient with a distal radial fracture. The rate of routine bone mineral density testing in patients with a distal radial fracture remains unacceptably low despite its value 34 . Patients who underwent testing after a fracture had a longer fracture-free interval (819 days) compared with those who did not have testing (579 days), once again highlighting the importance of early intervention.…”
Section: Wrist Traumamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from a Medicare cohort showed only 7% of patients with wrist fractures have DXA testing within 6 months of such injuries, yet 20% later develop fractures of the hip or spine. 39 The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and the American College of Endocrinology point out that errors in DXA scan acquisition and analysis can affect interpretation, and they encourage clinicians to review actual scan images and data rather than rely solely on a report, especially when it is discordant with the clinical picture. 40 Assuming this patient's DXA report was of good quality, there are other reasons to question whether it refl ects actual bone risk.…”
Section: ■ Case 2 Revisitedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research indicates that out of 46,992 subjects, only 20% had undergone DXA osteoporosis screening within two years before distal radius fracture, with males constituting only 5%. Ultimately, only 7% of patients received DXA osteoporosis testing within six months after the fracture [12]. These findings suggest significant underdiagnosis of osteoporosis currently, or an increase in fracture risk factors due to low examination frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%