2012
DOI: 10.1029/2011wr011472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate‐limited U(VI) desorption during a small‐scale tracer test in a heterogeneous uranium‐contaminated aquifer

Abstract: [1] A tracer test was performed at the Rifle Integrated Field Research Challenge site to assess the effect of addition of bicarbonate on U(VI) desorption from contaminated sediments in the aquifer and to compare equilibrium and rate-limited reactive transport model descriptions of mass transfer limitations on desorption. The tracer test consisted of injection of a 37 mM NaHCO 3 solution containing conservative tracers followed by downgradient sampling of groundwater at various elevations and distances from the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
66
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(91 reference statements)
6
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…50,51 This is supported by our results (biotic system) and indicates the effectiveness of biological U reduction in the subsurface in comparison to abiotic pathways if U(VI) is in the aqueous phase. Moreover, microbial metabolic activity can contribute to an increase in the bicarbonate concentration as a result of CO 2 production.…”
Section: Isotopic Measurementssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…50,51 This is supported by our results (biotic system) and indicates the effectiveness of biological U reduction in the subsurface in comparison to abiotic pathways if U(VI) is in the aqueous phase. Moreover, microbial metabolic activity can contribute to an increase in the bicarbonate concentration as a result of CO 2 production.…”
Section: Isotopic Measurementssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Anaerobic Rifle Artificial Groundwater (RAGW) was prepared based on the aqueous geochemical composition of site groundwater [which has been described elsewhere (Williams et al, 2011; Fox et al, 2012)]: 7.7 mM NaHCO 3 , 0.4 mM KCl, 4 mM MgSO 4 .7H 2 O, 4.8 mM CaSO 4 , and 2.6 mM NaCl. As the RAGW did not include a source of N or P, these would have to be provided by the aquifer sediment, as is presumably the case under in situ conditions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25%, and only 38% of the aquifer material is contained in the o2 mm size fraction and the majority is gravel size (Fox et al, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%