2002
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.032087199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate heterogeneity among lineages of tracheophytes: Integration of molecular and fossil data and evidence for molecular living fossils

Abstract: Many efforts to date evolutionary divergences by using a molecular clock have yielded age estimates that are grossly inconsistent with the paleontological evidence. Such discrepancies often are attributed to the inadequacy of the fossil record, but many potential sources of error can affect molecular-based estimates. In this study, we minimize the potential error caused by inaccurate topology and uncertain calibration times by using a well-supported tree, multiple genes, and multiple well-substantiated dates t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

18
152
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 232 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
18
152
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As has been noted elsewhere, however, the age estimates for all of these basal angiosperm divergences antedate the earliest unambiguous fossil angiosperms, which are of Hauterivian Age, Ϸ136-130 Mya (53)(54)(55)(56). A number of causes have been advanced to explain this discrepancy, ranging from missing fossil histories to the problems inherent in molecular-based dating techniques (51,52,(57)(58)(59). Our dating analyses rely on a large and apparently internally consistent data set (as judged by the similar phylogenetic results among the various partitions under ML) and consequently should be less susceptible to phylogenetic sources of error (52,57).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…As has been noted elsewhere, however, the age estimates for all of these basal angiosperm divergences antedate the earliest unambiguous fossil angiosperms, which are of Hauterivian Age, Ϸ136-130 Mya (53)(54)(55)(56). A number of causes have been advanced to explain this discrepancy, ranging from missing fossil histories to the problems inherent in molecular-based dating techniques (51,52,(57)(58)(59). Our dating analyses rely on a large and apparently internally consistent data set (as judged by the similar phylogenetic results among the various partitions under ML) and consequently should be less susceptible to phylogenetic sources of error (52,57).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…There remains active debate over methods for calibrating phylogenetic trees (42,47,59), but many alternative methods are not applicable to such large data sets. The alternative calibration point, the origin of the eudicots, produced slightly younger estimates of divergence times, dating the split between Fagales and Cucurbitales Ϸ10 my younger than that suggested by the fossil record and leading to, on average, 89% younger dates than for the alternative calibration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LRX phylogeny suggests that the origin and initial expansion of the LRX family predate the divergence of monocots and eudicots 160 to 240 million years ago (Wolfe et al, 1989;Goremykin et al, 1997;Soltis et al, 2002). The first step in the diversification of the LRX gene family possibly occurred by the duplication of a unique ancestral gene resulting in the two clades observed in modern angiosperms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both Arabidopsis and rice contain large duplicated segments, suggesting that they have undergone one or several polyploidization events during their evolutionary history. Monocots and eudicots diverged 180 to 240 million years ago (Wolfe et al, 1989;Goremykin et al, 1997;Soltis et al, 2002), and the main polyploidization or large duplication events still detectable in the genome of Arabidopsis and rice are estimated to have occurred around 112 million years and 40 to 50 million years ago, respectively Goff et al, 2002). Combined with local tandem duplications, polyploidization is a mechanism that generates multigene families and is a major source of evolutionary novelty.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%