2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2008.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate-dependent effects of bupropion on nicotine self-administration and food-maintained responding in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Liu et al (2008) reported that bupropion increased the ability of a nicotinepaired cue to reinstate behaviour, rather than decreasing this effect as might be expected of an effective smoking cessation treatment. This finding paralleled the effects of bupropion on nicotine self-administration, where rats pretreated with bupropion displayed enhanced nicotine intake (Rauhut et al 2003;Shoaib et al 2003;Stairs and Dworkin 2008), though others have reported no effect of bupropion (Bruijnzeel and Markou 2003;Paterson et al 2008) or a reduction in nicotine self-administration (Bruijnzeel and Markou 2003;Rauhut et al 2005), making it difficult to interpret such findings with confidence. One explanation for these contrasting findings may relate to the ratedependent effects of bupropion on self-administration behaviour, since the rate of responding for the primary reinforcer has been reported to influence the effects of bupropion (Stairs and Dworkin 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Liu et al (2008) reported that bupropion increased the ability of a nicotinepaired cue to reinstate behaviour, rather than decreasing this effect as might be expected of an effective smoking cessation treatment. This finding paralleled the effects of bupropion on nicotine self-administration, where rats pretreated with bupropion displayed enhanced nicotine intake (Rauhut et al 2003;Shoaib et al 2003;Stairs and Dworkin 2008), though others have reported no effect of bupropion (Bruijnzeel and Markou 2003;Paterson et al 2008) or a reduction in nicotine self-administration (Bruijnzeel and Markou 2003;Rauhut et al 2005), making it difficult to interpret such findings with confidence. One explanation for these contrasting findings may relate to the ratedependent effects of bupropion on self-administration behaviour, since the rate of responding for the primary reinforcer has been reported to influence the effects of bupropion (Stairs and Dworkin 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This finding paralleled the effects of bupropion on nicotine self-administration, where rats pretreated with bupropion displayed enhanced nicotine intake (Rauhut et al 2003;Shoaib et al 2003;Stairs and Dworkin 2008), though others have reported no effect of bupropion (Bruijnzeel and Markou 2003;Paterson et al 2008) or a reduction in nicotine self-administration (Bruijnzeel and Markou 2003;Rauhut et al 2005), making it difficult to interpret such findings with confidence. One explanation for these contrasting findings may relate to the ratedependent effects of bupropion on self-administration behaviour, since the rate of responding for the primary reinforcer has been reported to influence the effects of bupropion (Stairs and Dworkin 2008). Preclinical data for cannabinoid-1 (CB1) receptor selective antagonists have demonstrated that these compounds reduce both nicotine self-administration and the ability of nicotine-associated cues to reinstate responding for nicotine (Cohen et al 2002(Cohen et al , 2005De Vries et al 2005;Shoaib 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Some studies impose longer timeouts (cf. Neugebauer et al, 2007; Paterson et al, 2003), increase the response requirement, and/or manipulate the food deprivation schedule (Stairs and Dworkin, 2008) in the sucrose experiments meant to parallel drug self-administration studies. Unfortunately, making such a change in reinforcement schedule forces other factors to vary such as temporal pattern of responding and access to the reinforcer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanism by which bupropion improves cessation rates in smokers is not fully understood and preclinical studies show a wide range of effects depending on the model or dose used. In some preclinical self-administration studies, acute or repeated bupropion treatment does not have an effect on responding for nicotine (Paterson et al, 2008;10-60 mg/k;Shoaib et al, 2003), while others show increased responding at low doses (9 and 15 mg/kg; Rauhut et al, 2003) and decreased responding at higher doses (Hall et al, 2015;30-75 mg/kg;Liu et al, 2008;Rauhut et al, 2005;Stairs and Dworkin, 2008). Varenicline, on the other hand, is a partial agonist for α4β2 and full agonist for α3β2 and α7 nAChR's (Rollema et al, 2007(Rollema et al, , 2009.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%