Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate-dependent constitutive models of S690 high-strength structural steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the standard J-C model, C is regarded as a constant. However, the relationships described by Equations (13) and (14) are nonlinear in some cases, and thus C is modified as a variable related to the strain rate [26,27]. Whether C is a variable is dependent on the behavior of steel material.…”
Section: Johnson-cook (J-c) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the standard J-C model, C is regarded as a constant. However, the relationships described by Equations (13) and (14) are nonlinear in some cases, and thus C is modified as a variable related to the strain rate [26,27]. Whether C is a variable is dependent on the behavior of steel material.…”
Section: Johnson-cook (J-c) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exist two methods to determine C [26][27][28][29], which correspond to Equations (13) and (14) respectively:…”
Section: Johnson-cook (J-c) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Yang [8] investigated the sensitivity of the strain rate of S690 structural steel and developed a new Cowper-Symonds model to predict the dynamic increase factor and used the J-C model to fit true stress-strain curves. Amitava [9] predicted the thermal deformation behavior of aluminum 5083 by using J-C, Z-A, and strain-compensated Arrhenius models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%