IEEE INFOCOM '93 the Conference on Computer Communications, Proceedings
DOI: 10.1109/infcom.1993.253355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate-controlled static-priority queueing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
116
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 223 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
116
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Achieving desired rate for different applications running concurrently can also be achieved by rate-controlled-staticpriority as mentioned in [25]. However, this would require a very complicated arbiter at every tile in the system, amounting to a high overhead in terms of chip area.…”
Section: Arbiter Vs Resource Managermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Achieving desired rate for different applications running concurrently can also be achieved by rate-controlled-staticpriority as mentioned in [25]. However, this would require a very complicated arbiter at every tile in the system, amounting to a high overhead in terms of chip area.…”
Section: Arbiter Vs Resource Managermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Example of such schedulers is the Rate-controlled Static Priority (RCSP) scheduler [24]. This preserves the original traffic descriptors of each flow going through it and provides zero packet loss guarantees.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the three, it is easiest to reduce the complexity of the scheduling algorithm as there is a natural tradeoff between the complexity and the flexibility of the scheduler [119]. In fact, a number of techniques have already been proposed to reduce scheduling complexity, including those requiring constant time complexity [98,120,125].…”
Section: Data Path Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%