2015
DOI: 10.1002/kin.20919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate Constants and Activation Energies for Gas‐Phase Reactions of Three Cyclic Volatile Methyl Siloxanes with the Hydroxyl Radical

Abstract: Reaction with hydroxyl radicals (OH) is the major pathway for removal of cyclic volatile methyl siloxanes (cVMS) from air. We present new measurements of second‐order rate constants for reactions of the cVMS octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4), decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (D5), and dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane (D6) with OH determined at temperatures between 313 and 353 K. Our measurements were made using the method of relative rates with cyclohexane as a reference substance and were conducted in a 140‐mL gas‐p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
36
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(71 reference statements)
6
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The measured mean values of •OH reaction constants were compared with the literature values (Table 1 and Supplemental Data, Figure S1). For the cyclic VMS of D3, D4, and D5, the measured values from the present study were close to those measured by Atkinson [6] and those predicted by AOPWIN [13], whereas they were apparently smaller than those of Safron et al [20] and Xiao et al [21]. For D6, the measured values from the present study were statistically similar to those of Safron et al [21] but apparently greater than those of the AOPWIN [13] prediction.…”
Section: The Measured •Oh Reaction Constants For Vms and Comparison Wsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The measured mean values of •OH reaction constants were compared with the literature values (Table 1 and Supplemental Data, Figure S1). For the cyclic VMS of D3, D4, and D5, the measured values from the present study were close to those measured by Atkinson [6] and those predicted by AOPWIN [13], whereas they were apparently smaller than those of Safron et al [20] and Xiao et al [21]. For D6, the measured values from the present study were statistically similar to those of Safron et al [21] but apparently greater than those of the AOPWIN [13] prediction.…”
Section: The Measured •Oh Reaction Constants For Vms and Comparison Wsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…For the cyclic VMS of D3, D4, and D5, the measured values from the present study were close to those measured by Atkinson [6] and those predicted by AOPWIN [13], whereas they were apparently smaller than those of Safron et al [20] and Xiao et al [21]. For D6, the measured values from the present study were statistically similar to those of Safron et al [21] but apparently greater than those of the AOPWIN [13] prediction. For L2, the measured values from the present study were similar to those measured by Atkinson [6] and Sommerlade et al [22], whereas they were apparently greater than those measured by Markgraf and Wells [23] or predicted by AOPWIN [13].…”
Section: The Measured •Oh Reaction Constants For Vms and Comparison Wsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Two conditions guide us in using MS, the boiling point and thermal stability of the silanes and their species in the reaction medium. If they are thermally stable and volatile, one should use GC/MS, which gives good separation and a rich MS spectrum [36,93]. However, GC/MS is not a common technique due to the use of water as a reactant.…”
Section: Identification Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For chamber experiments that employed H 2 O 2 , the OH concentration was calculated by fitting the gas-phase D5 concentration to a first-order exponential, fixing the initial point of the fit as the initial D5 concentration (fits had R 2 > 0.75), and using the value for the reaction rate of OH with D5, k = 2.1 ± 0.1 × 10 −12 cm 3 molec −1 s −1 , which was measured using the relative rate method at 297 ± 3 K (Alton and Browne, 2020). Note that other experimental evaluations of the reaction rate of OH with D5 that use the relative rates method vary by less than a factor of 2 (the reasons for this difference are not known), which would not affect the order of magnitude of the OH concentration estimate (Kim and Xu, 2017;Safron et al, 2015;Xiao et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%