Rate and predictors for non-attendance of patients undergoing hospital outpatient treatment for chronic diseases: a register-based cohort study

Abstract

Background Failure to keep medical appointments results in inefficiencies and, potentially, in poor outcomes for patients. The aim of this study is to describe non-attendance rate and to investigate predictors of non-attendance among patients receiving hospital outpatient treatment for chronic diseases. Methods We conducted a historic, register-based cohort study using data from a regional hospital and included patients aged 18 years or over who were registered in ongoing outpatient treatment courses for seven selected chronic diseases on July 1, 2013. A total of 5895 patients were included and information about their appointments was extracted from the period between July 1, 2013 and June 30, 2015. The outcome measure was occurrence of non-attendance. The associations between non-attendance and covariates (age, gender, marital status, education level, occupational status, specific chronic disease and number of outpatient treatment courses) were investigated using multivariate logistic regression models, including mixed effect. Results During the two-year period, 35% of all patients (2057 of 5895 patients) had one or more occurrences of non-attendance and 5% of all appointments (4393 of 82,989 appointments) resulted in non-attendance. Significant predictors for non-attendance were younger age (OR 4.17 for 18 ≤ 29 years as opposed to 80+ years), male gender (OR 1.35), unmarried status (OR 1.39), low educational level (OR 1.18) and receipt of long-term welfare payments (OR 1.48). Neither specific diseases nor number of treatment courses were associated with a higher non-attendance rate. Conclusions Patients undergoing hospital outpatient treatments for chronic diseases had a non-attendance rate of 5%. We found several predictors for non-attendance but undergoing treatment for several chronic diseases simultaneously was not a predictor. To reduce non-attendance, initiatives could target the groups at risk. Trial registration This study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (Project ID 18/35695 ). Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-4208-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A telephone assessment and advice service within an ED Physiotherapy clinic: A single-site quality improvement cohort study

“…This non-signi cant nding is in sharp contrast to other literature [12,39,41,[45][46][47] and may be partly explained by the methodological study design and imbalance between study groups resulting in a high risk of confounding bias. Predictors of non-attendance include gender (male), younger age, unmarried status, low educational level and receipt of long-term welfare payments [48]. While data was collected on a number of these variables, the sample size, particularly in the face-to-face group is insu cient to control for these confounding factors using statistical methods.…”

Non‐attendance at diabetes outpatient appointments: a systematic review

“…Non‐attendance at healthcare appointments is a significant problem across the world. According to NHS England's quarterly review ending in March 2019, the overall non‐attendance rate for general follow‐up hospital outpatient appointments was 8% , with non‐attendance rates appearing similar for people with diabetes compared with other chronic health conditions . Non‐attendance is associated with suboptimal outcomes for the patient, and is a poor use of healthcare resources .…”

Education Level Among Patients with Major Limb Amputation

“…Similarly, our study showed lower education level of patients with major limb amputation compared to the general population, which may suggest that barriers such as the ability to understand basic health information, false health beliefs, disease self-management and compliance with treatment, and limited financial recourses may be an issue when dealing with patients with major limb amputation in our region. Furthermore, lower education level has been found to be a predictive factor for higher no-show rates and adherence to treatment [19,20]. Although not the aim of this study, we have also noticed a high no-show rate among amputee patients in our clinic.…”