2015
DOI: 10.1109/jsyst.2013.2251231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate-and-power control based energy-saving transmissions in OFDMA-based multicarrier base stations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unless otherwise noted, we followed common practice and placed the devices at random on a regular grid with 10 4 points defined over a square area of 1km × 1km, and the cloud is located at the center of the grid [41], [42]. For simplicity, we consider a static bandwidth assignment for the simulations; we assign a bandwidth of B i,j = 5 MHz for communication between device i and device j [43], [44], and for the device to cloud bandwidth assignment we consider two scenarios. In the elastic scenario the bandwidth B i,0 assigned for communication between device i and the cloud is independent of the number of devices.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unless otherwise noted, we followed common practice and placed the devices at random on a regular grid with 10 4 points defined over a square area of 1km × 1km, and the cloud is located at the center of the grid [41], [42]. For simplicity, we consider a static bandwidth assignment for the simulations; we assign a bandwidth of B i,j = 5 MHz for communication between device i and device j [43], [44], and for the device to cloud bandwidth assignment we consider two scenarios. In the elastic scenario the bandwidth B i,0 assigned for communication between device i and the cloud is independent of the number of devices.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very few works use traffic models that reflect long-term (as in [79] and [87]) or short-term (as in [54], [56], and [57] for call-level and [59] for packet-level) temporal fluctuations. Also, few works use traffic models that capture spatial fluctuations in traffic load, as in [52] and [53].…”
Section: E Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial traffic models are useful in evaluating the algorithm performance in large-scale networks, while temporal models are important to investigate the associated signaling overhead, which may jeopardize the energy saving benefits, if high overhead is expected. In addition, many works account only for transmission power consumption as in [9], [43], [49], [50], [54], [56], [57], [79], [82], [86], and [87]. Both transmission and circuit power consumption should be accounted for, as in [23], [33], [34], [52], [53], [59], [77], [78], and [88].…”
Section: E Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 17 demonstrates the effect of the number of users on the average transmission rates of the proposed algorithm, SBS-Cell-Enlarged, and SBS-Random. At low traffic volumes, the average transmission rates of the proposed algorithm are lower than those of SBS-Cell-Enlarged and SBS-Random, but higher than the average required transmission rate due to the efficient configurations of (3)- (8). However, recall that in terms of total power consumption (see Figure 16), the proposed algorithm performs better than SBS-Cell-Enlarged and SBS-Random.…”
Section: Effects Of the Number Of Users On The Various Performance Asmentioning
confidence: 91%