2008 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications 2008
DOI: 10.1109/iscc.2008.4625680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate adaptation algorithms for IEEE 802.11 networks: A survey and comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
9

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
46
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…In IEEE 802.11b, the transmission rates are 11, 5.5, 2, and 1 Mbps, whereas IEEE 802.11a/g offers 54, 48, 36, 24, 18, 12, 9, and 6 Mbps. These protocols specify multiple transmission rates, and the appropriate transmission rate can be selected so as not to exceed a certain bit error or frame error rate [15]. The appropriate transmission rate is usually selected by the original vendor algorithm † .…”
Section: Multi-rate Transmission Of Ieee80211 and Existing Throughpumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In IEEE 802.11b, the transmission rates are 11, 5.5, 2, and 1 Mbps, whereas IEEE 802.11a/g offers 54, 48, 36, 24, 18, 12, 9, and 6 Mbps. These protocols specify multiple transmission rates, and the appropriate transmission rate can be selected so as not to exceed a certain bit error or frame error rate [15]. The appropriate transmission rate is usually selected by the original vendor algorithm † .…”
Section: Multi-rate Transmission Of Ieee80211 and Existing Throughpumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that f = η satisfies (2) (2) in H. This solution is an optimal approximation of η in the least squares sense [27,Lem. 5].…”
Section: Adaptive Kernel Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IEEE 802.11 standards specify the use of a common MCS for all subcarriers. Link adaptation for 802.11-like systems is traditionally based on evaluation of the packet errors and/or simple one-dimensional features such as average SNR [2]. The autorate fallback (ARF) algorithm [3] as well as receiver-based autorate (RBAR) [4] are classic examples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data rate is configured according to the distance from AP in (c). Although there are other methods of configuring the data rate [10], we use the most typical approach, configuring it according to the distance from AP. The relationship between the distance and the data rate is different at each wireless device or vendor.…”
Section: A Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) Total throughput: First, to make sure the effect of Bianchi's model, we vary the number of stations in the range of [10,100] and measure the total throughput. Figure 2 shows the total throughput for basic-CSMA/CA, CSMA/CA with RTS/CTS, Bianchi's model and Bianchi's model with RTS/CTS.…”
Section: (A)ideal Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%