2018
DOI: 10.7554/elife.38090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rat behavior and dopamine release are modulated by conspecific distress

Abstract: Rats exhibit ‘empathy’ making them a model to understand the neural underpinnings of such behavior. We show data consistent with these findings, but also that behavior and dopamine (DA) release reflects subjective rather than objective evaluation of appetitive and aversive events that occur to another. We recorded DA release in two paradigms: one that involved cues predictive of unavoidable shock to the conspecific and another that allowed the rat to refrain from reward when there were harmful consequences to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(158 reference statements)
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It might be argued that the main reason why, here, ACC seems to encode social attention, but not vicarious emotion, is that rats performing the current task did not exhibit empathy. This is certainly possible, as we will discuss in the next paragraph, but it is important to point out that our rats did freeze, suppress food cup behavior, and approach when the other rat froze during shock-other trials, which other studies have used as evidence for empathy in rodents [16,36,37,40,42,44,[46][47][48]51]. Moreover, also consistent with previous work, we show that, when a rat is not experiencing shock, they exhibit less empathetic behavior [37,42,45,47].…”
Section: Articlesupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It might be argued that the main reason why, here, ACC seems to encode social attention, but not vicarious emotion, is that rats performing the current task did not exhibit empathy. This is certainly possible, as we will discuss in the next paragraph, but it is important to point out that our rats did freeze, suppress food cup behavior, and approach when the other rat froze during shock-other trials, which other studies have used as evidence for empathy in rodents [16,36,37,40,42,44,[46][47][48]51]. Moreover, also consistent with previous work, we show that, when a rat is not experiencing shock, they exhibit less empathetic behavior [37,42,45,47].…”
Section: Articlesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…First, let us consider blocks of trials where both the recording rat and the conspecific received outcomes (i.e., R/R trial blocks; Figure 2, top row). As shown previously, prior to outcome delivery, beam breaks increased and decreased on reward-self (blue) and shock-self (red) trials relative to neutral (orange) trials (Figure 2A), respectively [36]. After the presentation of the directional light cue (i.e., the cue that informed the rat which animal would receive the outcome), there was a significant increase in food cup entries for reward-self compared to reward-other trials, demonstrating that rats anticipated the receipt of reward before its delivery (Figure 2I, dark versus pale blue; Wilcoxon; z = 5.326; p < 0.001).…”
Section: Rats Correctly Internalize Auditory and Directional Light Cues And Block Contextsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations