2015
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1512.08931
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rasmussen s-invariants of satellites do not detect slice knots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, the Q-homology 0-bipolar knot is a Q-homology analog of 0-bipolar knots whose precise definition will be given in Section 3. As noted in [CK15], there are Q-homology 0-bipolar knots which generate a subgroup isomorphic to Z ∞ ⊕ Z ∞ 2 in either the smooth or topological knot concordance groups. In particular, all rationally slice knots are Q-homology 0-bipolar, so their sliceness cannot be detected by the ν + invariant by Theorem 1.7.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, the Q-homology 0-bipolar knot is a Q-homology analog of 0-bipolar knots whose precise definition will be given in Section 3. As noted in [CK15], there are Q-homology 0-bipolar knots which generate a subgroup isomorphic to Z ∞ ⊕ Z ∞ 2 in either the smooth or topological knot concordance groups. In particular, all rationally slice knots are Q-homology 0-bipolar, so their sliceness cannot be detected by the ν + invariant by Theorem 1.7.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This would give a negative answer to Kawauchi's question. Also inspired by recent work of Cha and the first author [CK15], we like to determine whether the collection of ν + invariants of satellites detects slice knots. More precisely, if ν + (P (K)) = ν + (P (U )) holds for all satellite patterns P ⊂ S 1 × D 2 , does it imply that K is slice?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%