2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rasch Analysis Staging Methodology to Classify Upper Extremity Movement Impairment After Stroke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
122
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
6
122
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To address the secondary aim, we used the cut-off scores 18 to divide the sample into individuals with severe (FMUE score <21 and FMLE score <15) and mild-to-moderate (FMUE score >21 and FMLE score >15) initial motor impairments. We conducted 2 Spearman correlations between SDNN and 3-month FMUE scores and SDNN and 3-month FMLE scores of severe participants.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the secondary aim, we used the cut-off scores 18 to divide the sample into individuals with severe (FMUE score <21 and FMLE score <15) and mild-to-moderate (FMUE score >21 and FMLE score >15) initial motor impairments. We conducted 2 Spearman correlations between SDNN and 3-month FMUE scores and SDNN and 3-month FMLE scores of severe participants.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 In our study, we used a total score of 60 because 6 points measure the presence of reflexes, which is considered a separate construct. 25 Moderate and severe arm impairment were defined by FMA scores of 20 to 47 and 1 to 19, respectively. 25 The WMFT consists of 15 performance-based items and 2 strength items, reflecting impairment and activity-level tasks.…”
Section: List Of Abbreviationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Moderate and severe arm impairment were defined by FMA scores of 20 to 47 and 1 to 19, respectively. 25 The WMFT consists of 15 performance-based items and 2 strength items, reflecting impairment and activity-level tasks. 26 It has high interrater and test/retest reliability, internal consistency, adequate stability, 27 and good construct and criterion validity.…”
Section: List Of Abbreviationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developed in 1975, the UE section of the Fugl-Meyer (UE FM) 4 remains one of the most established and widely-used 5 assessment of UE impairment in stroke. Moreover, the UE FM is recommended for use in stroke rehabilitative trials 6 and, unlike other measures of paretic UE dysfunction 7-9 only requires a few household items to administer, making it especially conducive for clinical use.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%