2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rare Variant Association Testing by Adaptive Combination of P-values

Abstract: With the development of next-generation sequencing technology, there is a great demand for powerful statistical methods to detect rare variants (minor allele frequencies (MAFs)<1%) associated with diseases. Testing for each variant site individually is known to be underpowered, and therefore many methods have been proposed to test for the association of a group of variants with phenotypes, by pooling signals of the variants in a chromosomal region. However, this pooling strategy inevitably leads to the inclusi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
77
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(91 reference statements)
1
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It would be appropriate to use methods more powerful for rare variants, such as burden tests and gene-based SNP-set (Sequence) Kernel Association Test (SKAT) tests. Burden tests analyze multiple rare variants, pool signals of these rare variants within a functional unit (e.g., a gene or a region), and then test for the association between the pooled signal and the phenotype [28]. Burden tests illustrate more power compared with studying individual variants one at a time [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would be appropriate to use methods more powerful for rare variants, such as burden tests and gene-based SNP-set (Sequence) Kernel Association Test (SKAT) tests. Burden tests analyze multiple rare variants, pool signals of these rare variants within a functional unit (e.g., a gene or a region), and then test for the association between the pooled signal and the phenotype [28]. Burden tests illustrate more power compared with studying individual variants one at a time [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the test statistics will increase as the window size increases using the approach of Zaykin et al [3] . Although top SNPs have been found to be the same irrespective of the windows size, larger windows sizes may lead to anticonservative results [26] .…”
Section: Bt Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, each sample can be a vector when multiple sites are considered jointly. Recently, there have been ever-increasing efforts on finding multiple SNVs jointly (DePristo et al 2011;Derkach et al 2013;Evangelou and Ioannidis 2013;Lin et al 2014;Liu et al 2014;Pan et al 2014). Also, we may test whether there is a collective inclining dominance of the representations of case samples over the ones of control samples, or vice versa, with help of the method proposed from Equations (79) and (84), as well as the extension introduced around Equations (87) and (89).…”
Section: Exome Sequencing Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%