Rare Event Simulation Using Monte Carlo Methods 2009
DOI: 10.1002/9780470745403.ch7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rare Event Analysis by Monte Carlo Techniques in Static Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This problem is encountered in a wide range of applications such as telecommunications, transportation, energy supply systems, and social networking, among others (Cancela et al, 2009a;Gertsbakh and Shpungin, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This problem is encountered in a wide range of applications such as telecommunications, transportation, energy supply systems, and social networking, among others (Cancela et al, 2009a;Gertsbakh and Shpungin, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many more. Cancela et al (2009a) survey and compare the best available methods so far for large highly-reliable networks. They conclude that one of the best performing methods is that of Hui et al (2005), which combines a cross-entropy technique with the merge process (also called turnip method) described in Gertsbakh and Shpungin (2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ditlevsen and Madsen [1], also known as static simulation problems or models by some other authors, see e.g. Homem-de-Mello and Rubinstein [2] and Cancela et al [3] and in which time is not an explicit variable. The probability w.r.t.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the most prominent ones are conditional Monte Carlo approaches (Cancela and El Khadiri 2003), , Elperin et al 1991, Shpungin 2010, Lomonosov andShpungin 1999), approximate zero-variance importance sampling , and combinations of these, see (Cancela et al 2010). For a survey of some of these methods see (Cancela, El Khadiri, and Rubino 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%