2023
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202310047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rare‐Earth‐Free Mn30Fe20−xCuxAl50 Magnetocaloric Materials with Stable Cubic CsCl‐Type Structure for Room‐Temperature Refrigeration

Yikun Zhang,
Weixiang Hao,
Chenglong Hu
et al.

Abstract: Magnetic refrigeration technology based on the magnetocaloric effect (MCE) of magnetic substances has been considered a prominent, energy‐efficient, and environmentally benign cooling method. Exploring suitable magnetic substances is a prerequisite for practical applications. A family of rare‐earth‐free magnetocaloric materials called Mn30Fe20−xCuxAl50 alloys is identified room‐temperature refrigeration, which are derived from the well‐known MnAl‐based permanent magnets. As expected from experimental and theor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnetic entropy change |Δ S M | illustrated in Figure e,f is calculated from the isofield magnetization curves in Figure c,d based on the Maxwell relation: normalΔ S M false( normalΔ H , T false) = H 0 H false( M false( T , H false) T false) H normald μ 0 H , where we choose μ 0 H 0 = 0 T. The maximal |Δ S M | for the Fe1.95 alloy is 0.50 J/kg K at 170 K with a second peak value of 0.32 J/kg K at 237 K at a magnetic field change of 2 T. For the Fe2.00 alloy, its maximal |Δ S M | is 0.39 J/kg K at 260 K at a magnetic field change of 2 T. The larger magnetization of the Fe1.95 alloy primarily contributes to its 22% larger magnetic entropy change compared to the Fe2.00 alloy. The maximal |Δ S M | of the Fe1.95 alloy is comparable to other Fe-based Laves compounds with a second-order transition, with 0.5 J/kg K in Sc 0.4 Ti 0.6 Fe 2 , with 0.46 J/kg K in Fe 2 Hf 0.85 Ti 0.15 and with 1.3 J/kg K in rare-earth-free Mn 30 Fe 20 Al 50 . It is however smaller than the Fe-based Laves phase materials with a first-order transition, with 1.7 J/kg K in Sc 0.3 Ti 0.7 Fe 2 and 2.3 J/kg K in Fe 2 Hf 0.86 Ta 0.14 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The magnetic entropy change |Δ S M | illustrated in Figure e,f is calculated from the isofield magnetization curves in Figure c,d based on the Maxwell relation: normalΔ S M false( normalΔ H , T false) = H 0 H false( M false( T , H false) T false) H normald μ 0 H , where we choose μ 0 H 0 = 0 T. The maximal |Δ S M | for the Fe1.95 alloy is 0.50 J/kg K at 170 K with a second peak value of 0.32 J/kg K at 237 K at a magnetic field change of 2 T. For the Fe2.00 alloy, its maximal |Δ S M | is 0.39 J/kg K at 260 K at a magnetic field change of 2 T. The larger magnetization of the Fe1.95 alloy primarily contributes to its 22% larger magnetic entropy change compared to the Fe2.00 alloy. The maximal |Δ S M | of the Fe1.95 alloy is comparable to other Fe-based Laves compounds with a second-order transition, with 0.5 J/kg K in Sc 0.4 Ti 0.6 Fe 2 , with 0.46 J/kg K in Fe 2 Hf 0.85 Ti 0.15 and with 1.3 J/kg K in rare-earth-free Mn 30 Fe 20 Al 50 . It is however smaller than the Fe-based Laves phase materials with a first-order transition, with 1.7 J/kg K in Sc 0.3 Ti 0.7 Fe 2 and 2.3 J/kg K in Fe 2 Hf 0.86 Ta 0.14 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The maximal |ΔS M | of the Fe1.95 alloy is comparable to other Fe-based Laves compounds with a second-order transition, with 0.5 J/kg K in Sc 0.4 Ti 0.6 Fe 2 , 32 with 0.46 J/kg K in Fe 2 Hf 0.85 Ti 0.15 12 and with 1.3 J/kg K in rare-earth-free Mn 30 Fe 20 Al 50 . 33 It is however smaller than the Fe-based Laves phase materials with a firstorder transition, with 1.7 J/kg K in Sc 0.3 Ti 0.7 Fe 2 32 and 2.3 J/kg K in Fe 2 Hf 0.86 Ta 0.14 . 8 For the latter, their saturation magnet- izations are ∼2.45 and 2.86 μ B /f.u., respectively, larger than the value of 1.86 μ B /f.u.…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] The magnetocaloric effect (MCE) demonstrated by magnetic materials was considered as a promising alternative to conventional gas compression refrigeration for energy efficient refrigeration technology. [6][7][8] The MCE of magnetic refrigeration materials significantly determines the feasibility of this technology application. La(Fe, Si) 13 -based compounds are considered as promising magnetic refrigeration materials for room temperature refrigeration and have received extensive attention and research, while there are still relatively fewer magnetic refrigeration candidates for the liquid hydrogen temperature region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, there has been significant interest in the understanding of magnetic and magnetocaloric properties of alloys and compounds upon the basis of transition metals like Fe or Co. Currently, magnetic refrigeration is widely acknowledged to be an energy-efficient and environmentally friendly commercialized technology. In these studies, there is room for magnetic nanostructured materials, whose properties can differ from those in their bulk counterparts. Many of these features, intrinsic for magnetic nanomaterials, have great potential for their use in data storage, biomedical, environmental, and heterogeneous catalysis applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%