2016
DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2016.23.106.8848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rare case of pure medial subtalar dislocation in a basketball player

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subtalar dislocation is noted more often in road traffic accidents than in sports injury because it involves greater velocity of force and higher energy transfer [ 5 ]. Lateral STJD is even rarer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subtalar dislocation is noted more often in road traffic accidents than in sports injury because it involves greater velocity of force and higher energy transfer [ 5 ]. Lateral STJD is even rarer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence is low, and it is easy to be confused with ankle dislocation, which accounts for about 1% of total joint dislocation. 5 , 6 , 7 Rarity of this injury can be attributed to the strong ligaments connecting the talus and the calcaneus, the strong biomechanical properties of the ankle and the tight joint capsule. 8 Most of the literature on this rare injury consists of isolated case reports rather than large case series, based on a PubMed literature search within the past 10 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean age at treatment was 32.54 years, ranging from 16 to 71 years [23,32]. The total number of patients for each study ranged between one and 10 [22,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. In one paper, the affected ankle was not specified (for a total of four patients); of the remaining 22 patients, the right ankle was affected 15 times (68.18%) and the left ankle seven times (31.82%).…”
Section: Patient Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean value of the Down and Black scale [20] was 9.58 points, showing that the mean quality of the included studies was poor. Among the 12 studies considered, 10 had poor results [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] and two had fair results [32,33]; more specifically, two papers had six points [27,29], two papers had seven points [25,28], one paper had eight points [24], two papers had nine points [22,26], one paper had 10 points [30], one paper had 11 points [31], one paper had 12 points [23], and two papers had 15 points [32,33].…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%