2016
DOI: 10.3354/meps11938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapidly obtained ecosystem indicators from coral reef soundscapes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A future goal of passive acoustic monitoring is to be able to relate soundscape characteristics to seascape characteristics in an effort to monitor habitats (e.g., [ 27 28 ]). Although there was only a weak positive relationship between call rate and oyster density across the eight sites, when grouped by restoration status, there is a significant difference in call rates between restored (spat on shell added) and unrestored reefs—with restored reefs having nearly twice as many calls as unrestored reefs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A future goal of passive acoustic monitoring is to be able to relate soundscape characteristics to seascape characteristics in an effort to monitor habitats (e.g., [ 27 28 ]). Although there was only a weak positive relationship between call rate and oyster density across the eight sites, when grouped by restoration status, there is a significant difference in call rates between restored (spat on shell added) and unrestored reefs—with restored reefs having nearly twice as many calls as unrestored reefs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques can yield spatially integrative and long-term continuous observations that can be collected autonomously with inexpensive recorders, but the sources of many reef sounds are challenging to identify [ 9 ]. Previously we established positive correlations (Pearsons ρ) between benthic macroalgal cover and aspects of coral reef soundscapes (acoustic pressure spectral density levels in the 2 to 20 kHz band) at 17 sites over a 2570 km transect from Kure Atoll to the Island of Hawaii [ 10 ]. These correlations were only observed during the day when overall sound levels were typically lower ( Table 1 ), and correlations of this nature did not exist between sound and any other non-acoustic environmental metric.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acoustic and visual indicators of reef health can be linked across spatial and temporal scales. Sound-pressure level (particularly at frequencies below 2 kHz) can positively correlate with coral cover, invertebrate abundance, and fish diversity (Kennedy et al, 2010;Kaplan et al, 2015Kaplan et al, , 2018Nedelec et al, 2015;Freeman and Freeman, 2016). Several other acoustic indices such as rates of invertebrate snapping sounds (Butler et al, 2017) and the acoustic complexity index (Pieretti et al, 2011) may also correlate with visual measures of diversity (Nedelec et al, 2015;Bertucci et al, 2016), although the generality of these trends is not fully established (Staaterman et al, 2017).…”
Section: Acoustic Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%