2019
DOI: 10.1029/2019jd030538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapidly Evolving Cirrus Clouds Modulated by Convectively Generated Gravity Waves

Abstract: Cirrus clouds can strongly affect Earth's radiation balance, but questions remain about their growth mechanisms and rates. Here we show that gravity (buoyancy) waves generated by a storm in Northern Australia on 13 November 2015 caused an observable rippling effect on cirrus clouds up to 1,000 km away, as seen by the recently launched Himawari‐8/9 geostationary satellite. Regional model simulations reproduce the propagation speed of the wave, which agrees with theoretical predictions, and show that the wave am… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The convectively driven latent heating also dictates the circulation pattern with a large updraft fed by the surface inflow, and detraining ICs between 12‐ and 15‐km elevation (Figures b, a, and b). The large initial heating is a vigorous source of gravity waves (Bretherton, ; Prasad et al, ), which significantly perturb the instantaneous wind fields while not influencing the mean winds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The convectively driven latent heating also dictates the circulation pattern with a large updraft fed by the surface inflow, and detraining ICs between 12‐ and 15‐km elevation (Figures b, a, and b). The large initial heating is a vigorous source of gravity waves (Bretherton, ; Prasad et al, ), which significantly perturb the instantaneous wind fields while not influencing the mean winds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are still some discrepancies in N i between the McFarlane_D experiment and the observations in the upper troposphere. The discrepancies can be caused by a lack of sub‐grid scale fluctuations induced by other gravity waves (Kärcher et al., 2019; Plougonven & Zhang, 2014; Prasad et al., 2019) or by bias in simulated aerosol properties (Shan et al., 2021; Shi & Liu, 2019; Wu et al., 2020; Yu et al., 2019) and deficiency in ice nucleation parameterizations (Shi & Liu, 2016). The abnormal simulated high‐ N i values in the lower stratosphere are all sporadic cases and have little effect on cloud bulk properties and climate forcing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, low values of LWCF imply a lesser amount of clouds in the atmosphere. Near the top of the atmosphere, high‐level cirrus clouds can still modulate LWCF (Prasad et al., 2019; Storelvmo & Herger, 2014; M. Wang et al., 2020). LWCF values from AIRS over Chiba from May 2017 to March 2020 show seasonal variations, as shown in Figure 12a.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%