2014
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/794/1/23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapidly Evolving and Luminous Transients From Pan-Starrs1

Abstract: In the past decade, several rapidly evolving transients have been discovered whose timescales and luminosities are not easily explained by traditional supernovae (SNe) models. The sample size of these objects has remained small due, at least in part, to the challenges of detecting short timescale transients with traditional survey cadences. Here we present the results from a search within the Pan-STARRS1 Medium Deep Survey (PS1-MDS) for rapidly evolving and luminous transients. We identify 10 new transients wi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

39
444
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 319 publications
(493 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
(198 reference statements)
39
444
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For SN 2005ek, Mej ≈ 0.2-0.7 M⊙ and MNi ≈ 0.02-0.05 M⊙ are appropriate to fit its light curve. The event rate of these SNe is estimated as ∼ 1% of core-collapse SN rate (Drout et al 2013(Drout et al , 2014, which is also compatible with an NS merger rate estimation (Abadie et al 2010). We took a different approach from previous studies on ultra-stripped SNe (Tauris et al 2013;Tauris et al 2015).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For SN 2005ek, Mej ≈ 0.2-0.7 M⊙ and MNi ≈ 0.02-0.05 M⊙ are appropriate to fit its light curve. The event rate of these SNe is estimated as ∼ 1% of core-collapse SN rate (Drout et al 2013(Drout et al , 2014, which is also compatible with an NS merger rate estimation (Abadie et al 2010). We took a different approach from previous studies on ultra-stripped SNe (Tauris et al 2013;Tauris et al 2015).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…To model these rapidly-evolving SNe with small ejecta mass, the progenitor stars are thought to be stripped much more than canonical stripped-envelope type Ib/c SNe, that is, ultra-stripped SNe coined by Tauris et al (2013); Tauris et al (2015). Besides SN 2005ek and other known SNe, ten rapidly-evolving transients were recently detected by Pan-STARRS1, which exhibit shorter decay-ing timescale (∼ 10 days) than canonical SNe with peak barometric luminosities ranging from ∼ 10 42 to 10 43 erg s −1 (Drout et al 2014). These ultra-stripped SNe are conjectured as products of close binary systems that experienced strong binary interactions, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relatively recent advent of all-sky, high-cadence transient surveys has led to the discovery of many rapidly evolving, luminous transients (see Drout et al 2014, for details). Drout et al (2014) have estimated the rate of rapid transients (whose luminosity decreases by at least 50 per cent in 12 days) to be 4-8 per cent of the core-collapse rate (at a redshift z = 0.2).…”
Section: Expected Light Curve Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drout et al (2014) have estimated the rate of rapid transients (whose luminosity decreases by at least 50 per cent in 12 days) to be 4-8 per cent of the core-collapse rate (at a redshift z = 0.2). Observationally, these newly discovered luminous transients form a heterogeneous group of objects, possibly suggesting a variety of explosion mechanisms.…”
Section: Expected Light Curve Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While typical Type Ib/Ic SNe reach their peak luminosity in ∼ 20 days (e.g., Drout et al 2011;Prentice et al 2016), rapidly-evolving SN LCs rise in less than ∼ 10 days and decline quickly on a similar timescale (e.g., Poznanski et al 2010;Perets et al 2010;Kawabata et al 2010;Kasliwal et al 2010;Ofek et al 2010;Kasliwal et al 2012;Drout et al 2013Drout et al , 2014Inserra et al 2015). The simplest way to interpret the rapid LC evolution of some Type Ib/Ic SNe is that their ejecta mass is much smaller than in the more slowly evolving SNe (see also, e.g., Kleiser & Kasen 2014;Drout et al 2014;Tanaka et al 2016). LC evolution becomes faster with smaller ejecta mass because of the smaller diffusion timescale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%