2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.mssp.2014.05.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid thermal annealing effects on the optical properties of GaAs0.9−xNxSb0.1 structures grown by MBE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The E N and C N values of 1.65 and 2.7 eV, obtained for the GaAsN [ 54 ] case, have been suggested [ 48 ]. Other pairs of values for as-grown samples have been proposed as the best fit parameters for E N and C N such as Lin (1.540 and 2.839 eV) [ 49 ], Sedrine (1.76 and 2.7 eV; 1.6 and 2.7 eV) [ 53 , 55 ] or Zhao (1.65 and 2.68 eV) [ 56 ]. The differences among the values, although apparently small, yield big differences in the outcomes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The E N and C N values of 1.65 and 2.7 eV, obtained for the GaAsN [ 54 ] case, have been suggested [ 48 ]. Other pairs of values for as-grown samples have been proposed as the best fit parameters for E N and C N such as Lin (1.540 and 2.839 eV) [ 49 ], Sedrine (1.76 and 2.7 eV; 1.6 and 2.7 eV) [ 53 , 55 ] or Zhao (1.65 and 2.68 eV) [ 56 ]. The differences among the values, although apparently small, yield big differences in the outcomes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences among the values, although apparently small, yield big differences in the outcomes. In addition, there are different sets of parameters for the annealed samples: Lin (1.65 and 2.7 eV) [ 48 ], Nunna (1.65 and 3.9 eV) [ 57 ] or Sedrine (1.8 and 2.7 eV) [ 55 ]. In Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the fitting procedure, the amplitude and broadening parameters of the different transition energies, the low energy CPPB parameters (energy ECPPB, amplitude and broadening), as well as the ZnO damaged layer thickness (d) and surface roughness (σSE), were varied simultaneously in order to fit the experimental data. The Levenberg-Marquardt regression algorithm [41][42][43] was used to minimize the mean square error (MSE) which measures the deviation between the theoretical model and the measurement, defined as follows: The bulk ZnO dielectric function (DF bulk ) in equation (2), as determined for the ZnO virgin substrate, was used in the data analysis for all the samples without any change. Indeed, the ZnO DF bulk (ε bulk ) is well-described by the Tanguy model (ε T ) [35] based on analytical expressions of Wannier excitons (bound and unbound states), and includes the high-frequency limit dielectric constant ε ∞ , and terms that describe contributions from low and high-energy transitions (CPPB 1 and CPPB 2 ).…”
Section: ( ) = + ( ) + Cppb + Cppbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the fitting procedure, the amplitude and broadening parameters of the different transition energies, the low energy CPPB parameters (energy E CPPB , amplitude and broadening), as well as the ZnO damaged layer thickness (d) and surface roughness (σ SE ), were varied simultaneously in order to fit the experimental data. The Levenberg-Marquardt regression algorithm [41][42][43] was used to minimize the mean square error (MSE) which measures the deviation between the theoretical model and the measurement, defined as follows:…”
Section: ( ) = + ( ) + Cppb + Cppbmentioning
confidence: 99%