2015
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid switching and complementary evidence accumulation enable flexibility of an all-or-none global workspace for control of attentional and conscious processing: a reply to Wyble et al .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The information about stimulus orientation gathered over several trials while the system dwells in the mode of visual discrimination may have to be loaded into visual working memory (Rideaux, Apthorp, & Edwards, 2015). If perceptual learning engages working memory in this fashion, then, according to a recent working memory model (Raffone, Srinivasan, & van Leeuwen, 2014;Simione et al, 2012), this process competes for central capacity with the uptake of incoming stimulus information (Meghanathan, van Leeuwen, & Nikolaev, 2015;Raffone, Srinivasan, & van Leeuwen, 2015). When memory loading absorbs the central capacity, this may result in reduced visual discrimination and hence in a weakening of grouping by proximity.…”
Section: Intermittent Brain Dynamics May Underlie the Observed Regimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The information about stimulus orientation gathered over several trials while the system dwells in the mode of visual discrimination may have to be loaded into visual working memory (Rideaux, Apthorp, & Edwards, 2015). If perceptual learning engages working memory in this fashion, then, according to a recent working memory model (Raffone, Srinivasan, & van Leeuwen, 2014;Simione et al, 2012), this process competes for central capacity with the uptake of incoming stimulus information (Meghanathan, van Leeuwen, & Nikolaev, 2015;Raffone, Srinivasan, & van Leeuwen, 2015). When memory loading absorbs the central capacity, this may result in reduced visual discrimination and hence in a weakening of grouping by proximity.…”
Section: Intermittent Brain Dynamics May Underlie the Observed Regimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neurocognitive models vary, with the AB for instance proposed to result from central capacity limitations for processing the targets (e.g., Chun and Potter, 1995;Isaak et al, 1999;Raffone et al, 2015;Vogel et al, 1998), from inhibition aimed at preventing in--depth processing of non--targets (Olivers and Meeter, 2008) or from overeager attentional control mechanisms that hamper the detection of a target as long as another target is being processed (Taatgen et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%