2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid suppression and sustained activation of distinct cortical regions for a delayed sensory-triggered motor response

Abstract: Highlights d Cortex-wide task-epoch-specific causal neural activity across sensorimotor learning d Rapid inhibitory response of orofacial cortex contributes to delay licking d Secondary whisker motor cortex is a key node converting whisker input to lick plan d Sensory information converges to a focal frontal area critical for delayed response

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
80
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(152 reference statements)
6
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To identify task-modulated neurons, we compared each neuron’s averaged background firing to its averaged firing rate ± 1 sec relative to grooming onsets via t -tests with a False Discovery Rate (FDR) Q of 1% using the Benjamini and Hochberg method 80 , 81 . To examine and identify cell-groom pairs, among significantly modulated neurons defined above, we subtracted background activity from their firing rates during individual groom bouts and averaged their firing rates across time bins within 1 s prior to grooming onset (“pre”), and within 1 s following grooming onset (“during”).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify task-modulated neurons, we compared each neuron’s averaged background firing to its averaged firing rate ± 1 sec relative to grooming onsets via t -tests with a False Discovery Rate (FDR) Q of 1% using the Benjamini and Hochberg method 80 , 81 . To examine and identify cell-groom pairs, among significantly modulated neurons defined above, we subtracted background activity from their firing rates during individual groom bouts and averaged their firing rates across time bins within 1 s prior to grooming onset (“pre”), and within 1 s following grooming onset (“during”).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These changes precede movement onset (64.3 (56-75) ms; mean (2.5%-97.5% confidence interval); blue dashed line in Figure 1G). Because activity along D go and CD response precede movement (Figure S1K), and because silencing of ALM results in loss of cued licking (Komiyama et al, 2010;Gao et al, 2018;Xu et al, 2019;Esmaeili et al, 2021;Bollu et al, 2021), we hypothesized that the mode switch is essential to initiate planned movement. We tested the hypothesis that the Go cue triggers non-selective D go signals in ALM, which then reorganizes movement-type-selective activity from CD delay to CD response to initiate movement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An instruction informs movement type (e.g., movement direction or target; eye, tongue, arm, or orienting movements) and a Go cue after a delay releases planned actions and thereby movement onset. The anterior lateral motor (ALM) cortex, a part of MCx, is necessary for motor planning and execution of directional licking in mice (Komiyama et al, 2010;Guo et al, 2014bGuo et al, , 2018Xu et al, 2019;Esmaeili et al, 2021;Bollu et al, 2021). Stimulation of ALM triggers rhythmic licking (Komiyama et al, 2010;Li et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anterior lateral motor cortex (ALM) is essential for planning and executing goal-directed licking, 11 , 12 , 18 , 19 and bilateral inactivation of ALM causes severe impairment of learned lick responses in mice. 20 23 Here, we unilaterally inactivated the ALM contralateral (left) to the whisker stimulus in mice performing the detection task by injecting the GABA A receptor agonist, muscimol ( Figures 1E and 1F ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%